Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614871›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Dynamic Morphology of the Ascending Aorta and Its Implications for Proximal Landing in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Denis Skrypnik, Marius Ante, Katrin Meisenbacher, Dorothea Kronsteiner, Matthias Hagedorn, Fabian Rengier, Florian Andre, Norbert Frey, Dittmar Böckler, Moritz S Bischoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamic Morphology of Dilated Ascending Aorta and its Implications for Proximal Landing During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denis SkrypnikDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-6347
Marius AnteDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin MeisenbacherDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Dorothea KronsteinerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias HagedornDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian RengierClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9424-4652
Florian AndreClinic for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1428-2611
Norbert FreyClinic for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Dittmar BöcklerDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Moritz S BischoffDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we assessed the dynamic segmental anatomy of the entire ascending aorta (AA), enabling the determination of a favorable proximal landing zone and appropriate aortic sizing for the most proximal thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: Patients with a non-operated AA (diameter < 40 mm) underwent electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography (ECG-CTA) of the entire AA in the systolic and diastolic phases. For each plane of each segment, the maximum and minimum diameters in the systole and diastole phases were recorded. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare aortic size values. Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled (53% male; median age 82.1 years; age range 76.8−85.1). Analysis of the dynamic plane dimensions of the AA during the cardiac cycle showed significantly higher systolic values than diastolic values (p < 0.001). Analysis of the proximal AA segment showed greater distal plane values than proximal plane values (p < 0.001), showing a reversed funnel form. At the mid-ascending segment, the dynamic values did not notably differ between the distal plane and the proximal segmental plane, demonstrating a cylindrical form. At the distal segment of the AA, the proximal plane values were larger than the distal segmental plane values (p < 0.001), thus generating a funnel form. Conclusions: The entire AA showed greater systolic than diastolic aortic dimensions throughout the cardiac cycle. The mid-ascending and distal-ascending segments showed favorable forms for TEVAR using a regular cylindrical endograft design. The most proximal segment of the AA showed a pronounced conical form; therefore, a specific endograft design should be considered.

Indexed as

dynamic morphology of ascending aortaendograft of ascending aortalanding zone morphologyTEVAR of ascending aortathoracic endovascular aortic repair

Identifiers

PMID36614871
PMCPMC9821435
OpenAlexW4313511318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.