ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Automatic Masseter Muscle Accurate Segmentation from CBCT Using Deep Learning-Based Model.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel fluoride tray-assisted workflow for artificial intelligence-driven automated maxillary gingival segmentation on cone beam CT.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Article
- Automated prediction of hand-wrist maturation stage from lateral cephalometric and panoramic radiographs using a deep learning approach.European journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based automated masseter muscle area on routine CT stratifies survival in oral cancer.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontics: a narrative review.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Review
- Using Deep Learning to Perform Automatic Quantitative Measurement of Masseter and Tongue Muscles in Persons With Dementia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Assessing masseter muscle volume and activity in relation to craniofacial morphology: a 3D CBCT study.Oral radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segmentation of the masseter muscle (MM) on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is challenging due to the lack of sufficient soft-tissue contrast. Moreover, manual segmentation is laborious and time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to propose a deep learning-based automatic approach to accurately segment the MM from CBCT under the refinement of high-quality paired computed tomography (CT). Fifty independent CBCT and 42 clinically hard-to-obtain paired CBCT and CT were manually annotated by two observers. A 3D U-shape network was carefully designed to segment the MM effectively. Manual annotations on CT were set as the ground truth. Additionally, an extra five CT and five CBCT auto-segmentation results were revised by one oral and maxillofacial anatomy expert to evaluate their clinical suitability. CBCT auto-segmentation results were comparable to the CT counterparts and significantly improved the similarity with the ground truth compared with manual annotations on CBCT. The automatic approach was more than 332 times shorter than that of a human operation. Only 0.52% of the manual revision fraction was required. This automatic model could simultaneously and accurately segment the MM structures on CBCT and CT, which can improve clinical efficiency and efficacy, and provide critical information for personalized treatment and long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.