ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Clinical Effect of Arthroscopic Resection of Extra-Articular Knee Osteochondroma.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-05Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Copyright Claims · Duplication of/in Article · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes of arthroscopic resection of extraarticular knee osteochondroma. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 74 patients with extra-articular knee osteochondroma treated by arthroscopic resection between August 2011 and August 2021, including 43 males and 31 females. Overall, 26 Distal femur cases and 48 proximal tibia cases were involved, with an average age of 31.7 ± 11.3 (11−57) years. Preoperative routine knee X-ray, CT, and MRI were performed before the operation. The Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner knee motor function score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate symptoms and functions before surgery and 3, 6, 12, and ≥24 months after surgery. Results: The average course of disease was (7.9 ± 3.7) months (range, 3−14 months) in 74 patients. The average follow-up was (22.6 ± 6.4) months (range, 10−37 months). There were no cases of vascular or nerve injury or wound infection. Compared with the preoperative function, the average scores of VAS, Lysholm, IKDC, and Tegner joint motor function decreased or increased significantly compared with the last follow-up (3.6 ± 1.1 vs. 0.1 ± 0.02, 44.5 ± 2.3 vs. 91.3 ± 4.9, 53.7 ± 2.6 vs. 94.2 ± 5.1, 4.6 ± 1.2 vs. 9.4 ± 1.4, p < 0.001). There was no recurrence or metastasis during the follow up. Conclusions: With the advantages of less trauma, high precision, less pain, and rapid recovery, arthroscopic resection of extra-articular knee osteochondroma can significantly improve the function of knee. It can be gradually extended to the treatment of other benign bone tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.