Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614718›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Research Progress on Low-Pressure Powder Injection Molding.

Vahid Momeni, Margarete Hufnagl, Zahra Shahroodi, Joamin Gonzalez-Gutierrez, Stephan Schuschnigg, Christian Kukla, Clemens Holzer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vahid MomeniPolymer Processing, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Margarete HufnaglPolymer Processing, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Zahra ShahroodiPolymer Processing, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Joamin Gonzalez-GutierrezPolymer Processing, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4737-9823
Stephan SchuschniggPolymer Processing, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2601-967X
Christian KuklaIndustrial Liaison Department, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2233-009X
Clemens HolzerPolymer Processing, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5149-7895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powder injection molding (PIM) is a well-known technique to manufacture net-shaped, complicated, macro or micro parts employing a wide range of materials and alloys. Depending on the pressure applied to inject the feedstock, this process can be separated into low-pressure (LPIM) and high-pressure (HPIM) injection molding. Although the LPIM and HPIM processes are theoretically similar, all steps have substantial differences, particularly feedstock preparation, injection, and debinding. After decades of focusing on HPIM, low-viscosity feedstocks with improved flowability have recently been produced utilizing low-molecular-weight polymers for LPIM. It has been proven that LPIM can be used for making parts in low quantities or mass production. Compared to HPIM, which could only be used for the mass production of metallic and ceramic components, LPIM can give an outstanding opportunity to cover applications in low or large batch production rates. Due to the use of low-cost equipment, LPIM also provides several economic benefits. However, establishing an optimal binder system for all powders that should be injected at extremely low pressures (below 1 MPa) is challenging. Therefore, various defects may occur throughout the mixing, injection, debinding, and sintering stages. Since all steps in the process are interrelated, it is important to have a general picture of the whole process which needs a scientific overview. This paper reviews the potential of LPIM and the characteristics of all steps. A complete academic and research background survey on the applications, challenges, and prospects has been indicated. It can be concluded that although many challenges of LPIM have been solved, it could be a proper solution to use this process and materials in developing new applications for technologies such as additive manufacturing and processing of sensitive alloys.

Indexed as

binder systemdebindingfeedstockLPIMsinteringthermal wick debinding

Identifiers

PMID36614718
PMCPMC9822315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.