Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614586›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Can Abutment with Novel Superlattice CrN/NbN Coatings Influence Peri-Implant Tissue Health and Implant Survival Rate Compared to Machined Abutment? 6-Month Results from a Multi-Center Split-Mouth Randomized Control Trial.

Francesco Pera, Maria Menini, Mario Alovisi, Armando Crupi, Giulia Ambrogio, Sofia Asero, Carlotta Marchetti, Camilla Canepa, Laura Merlini, Paolo Pesce and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influence of Surface Characteristics of TiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesco PeraDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Maria MeniniDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-1201
Mario AlovisiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2523-8149
Armando CrupiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-8083
Giulia AmbrogioDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Sofia AseroDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Carlotta MarchettiDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Camilla CanepaDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Laura MerliniDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Paolo PesceDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8726-4145
Massimo CarossaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-1832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present multi-center split-mouth randomized control trial was to investigate the effect on peri-implant tissue of abutment with chromium nitride/ niobium nitride (CrN/NbN) coatings (superlattice) compared to traditional machined surface. Methods: Two adjacent posterior implants were inserted in 20 patients. A machined abutment was randomly screwed on either the mesial or distal implant, while a superlattice abutment was screwed on the other one. Implant survival rate, peri-implant probing depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), and bleeding index (BI) were collected 6 months after surgery, while marginal bone loss (MBL) was evaluated at T0 and T6.; Results: Implant survival rate was 97.7%. A total MBL of 0.77 ± 0.50 mm was recorded for superlattice abutments, while a mean MBL of 0.79 ± 0.40 mm was recorded for the abutment with machined surface. A mean PPD of 1.3 ± 0.23 mm was recorded for the superlattice Group, and a mean PPD of 1.31 ± 0.3 was recorded for the machined surface Group. PI was of 0.55 ± 0.51 for superlattice Group and 0.57 ± 0.50 for machined Group, while BI was of 0.47 ± 0.49 for superlattice Group and of 0.46 ± 0.40 for the machined one. No statistically significant difference was highlighted between the two Groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: After a 6-month observational period, no statistically significant differences were highlighted between superlattice abutment and traditional machined abutment. Further in vitro studies as well as clinical research with longer follow-ups are required to better investigate the surface properties of the novel abutments’ superlattice coating and its effect on the oral tissues.

Indexed as

abutmentCrN/NbN coatingsdental implantsmachined surfacesmarginal bone losssuperlatticesurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID36614586
PMCPMC9821948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.