Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614515›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Organic Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries: Recent Progress and Challenges.

Alexander A Pavlovskii, Konstantin Pushnitsa, Alexandra Kosenko, Pavel Novikov, Anatoliy A Popovich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Brief Review of MoOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander A PavlovskiiInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3425-2751
Konstantin PushnitsaInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Alexandra KosenkoInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9096-8570
Pavel NovikovInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9748-6910
Anatoliy A PopovichInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the search for novel anode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), organic electrode materials have recently attracted substantial attention and seem to be the next preferred candidates for use as high-performance anode materials in rechargeable LIBs due to their low cost, high theoretical capacity, structural diversity, environmental friendliness, and facile synthesis. Up to now, the electrochemical properties of numerous organic compounds with different functional groups (carbonyl, azo, sulfur, imine, etc.) have been thoroughly explored as anode materials for LIBs, dividing organic anode materials into four main classes: organic carbonyl compounds, covalent organic frameworks (COFs), metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and organic compounds with nitrogen-containing groups. In this review, an overview of the recent progress in organic anodes is provided. The electrochemical performances of different organic anode materials are compared, revealing the advantages and disadvantages of each class of organic materials in both research and commercial applications. Afterward, the practical applications of some organic anode materials in full cells of LIBs are provided. Finally, some techniques to address significant issues, such as poor electronic conductivity, low discharge voltage, and undesired dissolution of active organic anode material into typical organic electrolytes, are discussed. This paper will guide the study of more efficient organic compounds that can be employed as high-performance anode materials in LIBs.

Indexed as

lithium-ion batteriesorganic anode materialsredox-active organic anode

Identifiers

PMID36614515
PMCPMC9822040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.