ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Machine Learning Method for Fatigue Strength Prediction of Nickel-Based Superalloy with Various Influencing Factors.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fatigue Life Prediction of 25CrMo4 Alloy Steel Based on Interpretable Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dynamic Ensemble Learning with Transfer Learning for Fatigue Performance Prediction in Ni-Based Superalloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Material Design of Porous Hydroxyapatite Ceramics via Inverse Analysis of an Estimation Model for Bone-Forming Ability Based on Machine Learning and Experimental Validation of Biological Hard Tissue Responses.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate prediction of fatigue performance is of great engineering significance for the safe and reliable service of components. However, due to the complexity of influencing factors on fatigue behavior and the incomplete understanding of the fatigue failure mechanism, it is difficult to correlate well the influence of various factors on fatigue performance. Machine learning could be used to deal with the association or influence of complex factors due to its good nonlinear approximation and multi-variable learning ability. In this paper, the gradient boosting regression tree model, the long short-term memory model and the polynomial regression model with ridge regularization in machine learning are used to predict the fatigue strength of a nickel-based superalloy GH4169 under different temperatures, stress ratios and fatigue life in the literature. By dividing different training and testing sets, the influence of the composition of data in the training set on the predictive ability of the machine learning method is investigated. The results indicate that the machine learning method shows great potential in the fatigue strength prediction through learning and training limited data, which could provide a new means for the prediction of fatigue performance incorporating complex influencing factors. However, the predicted results are closely related to the data in the training set. More abundant data in the training set is necessary to achieve a better predictive capability of the machine learning model. For example, it is hard to give good predictions for the anomalous data if the anomalous data are absent in the training set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.