ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Bioanalytical Assay Strategies and Considerations for Measuring Cellular Kinetics.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative pharmacokinetic derivations for axicabtagene ciloleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel in the treatment of B cell malignancies.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- CAR-T therapy-based innovations in the enhancement of contemporary anti-tumor therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive ddPCR Strategy for Sensitive and Reliable Monitoring of CAR-T Cell Kinetics in Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Recommendations for Method Development and Validation of qPCR and dPCR Assays in Support of Cell and Gene Therapy Drug Development.The AAPS journal · 2024Article
- Flow Cytometry and Its Applications to Molecular Biology and Diagnosis 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A vast evolution of drug modalities has occurred over the last several decades. Novel modalities such as cell and gene therapies have proven to be efficacious for numerous clinical indications-primarily in rare disease and immune oncology. Because of this success, drug developers are heavily investing in these novel modalities. Given the complexity of these therapeutics, a variety of bioanalytical techniques are employed to fully characterize the pharmacokinetics of these therapies in clinical studies. Industry trends indicate that quantitative PCR (qPCR) and multiparameter flow cytometry are both valuable in determining the pharmacokinetics, i.e. cellular kinetics, of cell therapies. This manuscript will evaluate the pros and cons of both techniques and highlight regulatory guidance on assays for measuring cellular kinetics. Moreover, common considerations when developing these assays will be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.