Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614018›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Impact of Nanoparticles on Male Fertility: What Do We Really Know? A Systematic Review.

Jean-Philippe Klein, Lionel Mery, Delphine Boudard, Célia Ravel, Michèle Cottier, Dimitrios Bitounis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jean-Philippe KleinUniversité Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne, INSERM, SAINBIOSE U1059, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1114-6801
Lionel MeryCHU de Saint-Etienne, Service D'Histologie-Embryologie-Cytogénétique, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France.
Delphine BoudardUniversité Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne, INSERM, SAINBIOSE U1059, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France.
Célia RavelCHU Rennes, Service de Biologie de la Reproduction-CECOS, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Michèle CottierUniversité Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne, INSERM, SAINBIOSE U1059, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France.
Dimitrios BitounisUniversité Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne, INSERM, SAINBIOSE U1059, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9739-3300

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The real impact of nanoparticles on male fertility is evaluated after a careful analysis of the available literature. The first part reviews animal models to understand the testicular biodistribution and biopersistence of nanoparticles, while the second part evaluates their in vitro and in vivo biotoxicity. Our main findings suggest that nanoparticles are generally able to reach the testicle in small quantities where they persist for several months, regardless of the route of exposure. However, there is not enough evidence that they can cross the blood-testis barrier. Of note, the majority of nanoparticles have low direct toxicity to the testis, but there are indications that some might act as endocrine disruptors. Overall, the impact on spermatogenesis in adults is generally weak and reversible, but exceptions exist and merit increased attention. Finally, we comment on several methodological or analytical biases which have led some studies to exaggerate the reprotoxicity of nanoparticles. In the future, rigorous clinical studies in tandem with mechanistic studies are needed to elucidate the real risk posed by nanoparticles on male fertility.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesTestisAnimalsFertilityMaleSpermatogenesisTissue Distributionblood–testis barriernanosized objectsreprotoxicitytesticular biodistribution

Identifiers

PMID36614018
PMCPMC9820737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.