Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613860›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Coronavirus-Specific Antibody and T Cell Responses Developed after Sputnik V Vaccination in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Alexey A Komissarov, Maria Kislova, Ivan A Molodtsov, Andrei A Petrenko, Elena Dmitrieva, Maria Okuneva, Iuliia O Peshkova, Naina T Shakirova, Daria M Potashnikova, Anna V Tvorogova and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alexey A KomissarovI.V. Davydovsky Clinical City Hospital, Moscow Department of Healthcare, 11/6 Yauzskaya Str., 109240 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1018-5195
Maria KislovaBotkin City Hospital, 5/17 2nd Botkinsky Drive, 125284 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8794-0120
Ivan A MolodtsovI.V. Davydovsky Clinical City Hospital, Moscow Department of Healthcare, 11/6 Yauzskaya Str., 109240 Moscow, Russia.
Andrei A PetrenkoBotkin City Hospital, 5/17 2nd Botkinsky Drive, 125284 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8461-5421
Elena DmitrievaBotkin City Hospital, 5/17 2nd Botkinsky Drive, 125284 Moscow, Russia.
Maria OkunevaBotkin City Hospital, 5/17 2nd Botkinsky Drive, 125284 Moscow, Russia.
Iuliia O PeshkovaNational Research Center for Hematology, 4a Novy Zykovsky Proezd, 125167 Moscow, Russia.
Naina T ShakirovaNational Research Center for Hematology, 4a Novy Zykovsky Proezd, 125167 Moscow, Russia.
Daria M PotashnikovaI.V. Davydovsky Clinical City Hospital, Moscow Department of Healthcare, 11/6 Yauzskaya Str., 109240 Moscow, Russia.
Anna V TvorogovaI.V. Davydovsky Clinical City Hospital, Moscow Department of Healthcare, 11/6 Yauzskaya Str., 109240 Moscow, Russia.
Vadim V PtushkinBotkin City Hospital, 5/17 2nd Botkinsky Drive, 125284 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9368-6050
Grigory A EfimovNational Research Center for Hematology, 4a Novy Zykovsky Proezd, 125167 Moscow, Russia.
Eugene A NikitinBotkin City Hospital, 5/17 2nd Botkinsky Drive, 125284 Moscow, Russia.
Elena VasilievaI.V. Davydovsky Clinical City Hospital, Moscow Department of Healthcare, 11/6 Yauzskaya Str., 109240 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4111-0874
Botkin Hospital · RUCity Clinical Hospital · RUNational Medical Research Center for Hematology · RUMoscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry · RURussian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education · RU

Funding

Moscow Center for Healthcare Innovations agreement № 2312-29/22Moscow Department of Healthcare DC № DZM-30-3 from 13.08.2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical course of the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has shown that patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are characterized by a high mortality rate, poor response to standard treatment, and low virus-specific antibody response after recovery and/or vaccination. To date, there are no data on the safety and efficacy of the combined vector vaccine Sputnik V in patients with CLL. Here, we analyzed and compared the magnitudes of the antibody and T cell responses after vaccination with the Sputnik V vaccine among healthy donors and individuals with CLL with different statuses of preexposure to coronavirus. We found that vaccination of the COVID-19-recovered individuals resulted in the boosting of pre-existing immune responses in both healthy donors and CLL patients. However, the COVID-19-naïve CLL patients demonstrated a considerably lower antibody response than the healthy donors, although they developed a robust T cell response. Regardless of the previous infection, the individuals over 70 years old demonstrated a decreased response to vaccination, as did those receiving anti-CD20 therapy. In summary, we showed that Sputnik V, like other vaccines, did not induce a robust antibody response in individuals with CLL; however, it provided for the development of a significant anti-COVID-19 T cell response.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellAgedAntibodies, ViralHumansT-LymphocytesVaccinationVaccines, CombinedVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesGam-COVID-Vac vaccineVaccines, CombinedVaccines, Syntheticantibodychronic lymphocytic leukemiaCOVID-19ELISpotimmune responseSARS-CoV-2T cellsvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36613860
PMCPMC9820366
OpenAlexW4313260077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.