Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613583›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Quality Control of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Colonies by Computational Image Analysis Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Anastasiya Mamaeva, Olga Krasnova, Irina Khvorova, Konstantin Kozlov, Vitaly Gursky, Maria Samsonova, Olga Tikhonova, Irina Neganova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Automated Image-Based Profiling of Pluripotent Stem Cell Colonies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anastasiya MamaevaMathematical Biology and Bioinformatics Lab, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Olga KrasnovaInstitute of Cytology, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Irina KhvorovaFaculty of Biology, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Konstantin KozlovMathematical Biology and Bioinformatics Lab, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6765-236X
Vitaly GurskyIoffe Institute, 194021 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4094-1983
Maria SamsonovaMathematical Biology and Bioinformatics Lab, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Olga TikhonovaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, 119121 Moscow, Russia.
Irina NeganovaInstitute of Cytology, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RUInstitute of Cytology · RUInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry · RUIoffe Institute · RUSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under the strategic academic leadership program "Priority 2030" Agreement 075-15-2021-1333 dated 30 September 2021Russian Science Foundation 21-75-20132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human pluripotent stem cells are promising for a wide range of research and therapeutic purposes. Their maintenance in culture requires the deep control of their pluripotent and clonal status. A non-invasive method for such control involves day-to-day observation of the morphological changes, along with imaging colonies, with the subsequent automatic assessment of colony phenotype using image analysis by machine learning methods. We developed a classifier using a convolutional neural network and applied it to discriminate between images of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) colonies with "good" and "bad" morphological phenotypes associated with a high and low potential for pluripotency and clonality maintenance, respectively. The training dataset included the phase-contrast images of hESC line H9, in which the morphological phenotype of each colony was assessed through visual analysis. The classifier showed a high level of accuracy (89%) in phenotype prediction. By training the classifier on cropped images of various sizes, we showed that the spatial scale of ~144 μm was the most informative in terms of classification quality, which was an intermediate size between the characteristic diameters of a single cell (~15 μm) and the entire colony (~540 μm). We additionally performed a proteomic analysis of several H9 cell samples used in the computational analysis and showed that cells of different phenotypes differentiated at the molecular level. Our results indicated that the proposed approach could be used as an effective method of non-invasive automated analysis to identify undesirable developmental anomalies during the propagation of pluripotent stem cells.

Indexed as

Pluripotent Stem CellsProteomicsEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerQuality Controlconvolutional neural networksdeep learninghuman pluripotent stem cellsimage processingpluripotency

Identifiers

PMID36613583
PMCPMC9820636
OpenAlexW4313505565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.