Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613357›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Development of Non-Targeted Mass Spectrometry Method for Distinguishing Spelt and Wheat.

Kapil Nichani, Steffen Uhlig, Bertrand Colson, Karina Hettwer, Kirsten Simon, Josephine Bönick, Carsten Uhlig, Sabine Kemmlein, Manfred Stoyke, Petra Gowik and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kapil NichaniQuoData GmbH, Prellerstr. 14, D-01309 Dresden, Germany.
Steffen UhligQuoData GmbH, Fabeckstr. 43, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.
Bertrand ColsonQuoData GmbH, Prellerstr. 14, D-01309 Dresden, Germany.
Karina HettwerQuoData GmbH, Prellerstr. 14, D-01309 Dresden, Germany.
Kirsten SimonQuoData GmbH, Prellerstr. 14, D-01309 Dresden, Germany.
Josephine BönickBundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, D-10589 Berlin, Germany.
Carsten UhligAkees GmbH, Ansbacher Str. 11, D-10787 Berlin, Germany.
Sabine KemmleinBundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Diedersdorfer Weg. 1, D-12277 Berlin, Germany.
Manfred StoykeBundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Diedersdorfer Weg. 1, D-12277 Berlin, Germany.
Petra GowikBundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Diedersdorfer Weg. 1, D-12277 Berlin, Germany.
Gerd HuschekIGV-Institut für Getreideverarbeitung GmbH, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 40/41, D-14558 Nuthetal, Germany.
Harshadrai M RawelInstitute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, D-14558 Nuthetal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2768-1531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food fraud, even when not in the news, is ubiquitous and demands the development of innovative strategies to combat it. A new non-targeted method (NTM) for distinguishing spelt and wheat is described, which aids in food fraud detection and authenticity testing. A highly resolved fingerprint in the form of spectra is obtained for several cultivars of spelt and wheat using liquid chromatography coupled high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). Convolutional neural network (CNN) models are built using a nested cross validation (NCV) approach by appropriately training them using a calibration set comprising duplicate measurements of eleven cultivars of wheat and spelt, each. The results reveal that the CNNs automatically learn patterns and representations to best discriminate tested samples into spelt or wheat. This is further investigated using an external validation set comprising artificially mixed spectra, samples for processed goods (spelt bread and flour), eleven untypical spelt, and six old wheat cultivars. These cultivars were not part of model building. We introduce a metric called the D score to quantitatively evaluate and compare the classification decisions. Our results demonstrate that NTMs based on NCV and CNNs trained using appropriately chosen spectral data can be reliable enough to be used on a wider range of cultivars and their mixes.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksfingerprintingfood fraudLC-MSmachine learningnon-targeted methodsspeltwheat

Identifiers

PMID36613357
PMCPMC9818861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.