Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613340›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Camelia Filofteia Diguță, Constanța Mihai, Radu Cristian Toma, Carmen Cîmpeanu, Florentina Matei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sequential Inoculation of IndigenousFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Functional Profiling ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. First Report on Antifungal Activity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Probiotic Yeasts: A Developing Reality?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Veterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camelia Filofteia DiguțăFaculty of Biotechnologies, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59, Mărăști Blvd., District 1, 011464 Bucharest, Romania.
Constanța MihaiFaculty of Land Reclamation and Environmental Engineering, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59, Mărăști Blvd., District 1, 011464 Bucharest, Romania.
Radu Cristian TomaFaculty of Biotechnologies, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59, Mărăști Blvd., District 1, 011464 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3912-1120
Carmen CîmpeanuFaculty of Land Reclamation and Environmental Engineering, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59, Mărăști Blvd., District 1, 011464 Bucharest, Romania.
Florentina MateiFaculty of Biotechnologies, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59, Mărăști Blvd., District 1, 011464 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7568-9952
University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest · RO

Funding

University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest 1262/30.07.2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate in vitro the probiotic potential of three yeasts strains (BB06, OBT05, and MT07) isolated from agro-food natural sources. Screening was performed, including several functional, technological, and safety aspects of the yeast strains, in comparison to a reference Saccharomyces boulardii, to identify the ones with suitable probiotic attributes in aquaculture. The yeast strains were identified by 5.8S rDNA-ITS region sequencing as Metschnikowia pulcherrima OBT05, Saccharomyces cerevisiae BB06, and Torulaspora delbrueckii MT07. All yeast strains were tolerant to different temperatures, sodium chloride concentrations, and wide pH ranges. S. cerevisiae BB06 showed a strong and broad antagonistic activity. Moreover, the S. cerevisiae strain exhibited a high auto-aggregation ability (92.08 ± 1.49%) and good surface hydrophobicity to hexane as a solvent (53.43%). All of the yeast strains have excellent antioxidant properties (>55%). The high survival rate in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) can promote yeast isolates as probiotics. All yeast strains presented a resistance pattern to the antibacterial antibiotics. Non-hemolytic activity was detected. Furthermore, freeze-drying with cryoprotective agents maintained a high survival rate of yeast strains, in the range of 74.95−97.85%. According to the results obtained, the S. cerevisiae BB06 strain was found to have valuable probiotic traits.

Indexed as

non-Saccharomycesprobiotic propertiesSaccharomycessafety issue

Identifiers

PMID36613340
PMCPMC9818403
OpenAlexW4313328054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.