Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613239›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Evaluation of the Prevalence of

Gamal Hamad, Amr Amer, Ghada Kirrella, Taha Mehany, Reham A Elfayoumy, Rasha Elsabagh, Eman M Elghazaly, Tuba Esatbeyoglu, Ahmed Taha, Ahmed Zeitoun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Estimating the Prevalence of Foodborne PathogenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Gamal HamadDepartment of Food Technology, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El-Arab 21934, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8910-4038
Amr AmerDepartment of Food Hygiene and Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-5495-5828
Ghada KirrellaDepartment of Food Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt.
Taha MehanyDepartment of Food Technology, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El-Arab 21934, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7960-7558
Reham A ElfayoumyDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, Damietta 34511, Egypt.
Rasha ElsabaghDepartment of Food Hygiene and Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Qaluobia 13736, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1759-7443
Eman M ElghazalyDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Matrouh University, Matrouh 51511, Egypt.
Tuba EsatbeyogluDepartment of Food Development and Food Quality, Institute of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University Hannover, Am Kleinen Felde 30, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2413-6925
Ahmed TahaDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-291X
Ahmed ZeitounDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1865-8201
Alexandria University · EGCity of Scientific Research and Technological Applications · EGBenha University · EGCenter for Physical Sciences and Technology · LTDamietta University · EGEgypt Nanotechnology Center · EGKafrelsheikh University · EGLeibniz University Hannover · DE

Funding

Leibniz University Hannover Leibniz Universität Hannover
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to assess the occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus in chicken fillets and to control its growth using various lyophilized seaweed extracts (i.e., Halimeda opuntia (HO), Actinotrichia fragilis, and Turbinaria turbinata) by an agar disk diffusion assay in vitro. Results showed that prevalence of S. aureus in breast and thigh samples reached of 92% and 84%, respectively. Lyophilized HO extract was the only seaweed that showed the antibacterial activity against S aureus with a significant difference at p < 0.05. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of HO extract was 1.5%, with an inhibition zone of 8.16 ± 0.73 mm. Regarding 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activity, IC50 was recorded at 55.36 μg/mL, whereas cytotoxic IC50 of the lyophilized HO extract on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was 33.7 µg/mL; a higher IC50 of HO extracts permits their use as a safe food additive in meat products. Moreover, total phenolic compounds and total flavonoids compounds recorded 20.36 ± 0.092 and 16.59 ± 0.029 mg/mL, respectively. HPLC analyses of phenolic compounds profiles exhibited many bioactive substances and the higher ratio was daidzein with 10.84 ± 0.005 µg/mL and followed by gallic acid with a value of 4.06 ± 0.006 µg/mL. In a challenge study, chicken fillet (CHF) experimentally inoculated with S. aureus (ST) and treated with the lyophilized HO algal extract at 4% and 6% (CHF/ST/HO) showed a complete reduction of S. aureus count on the 6th and 4th days in chicken fillet stored at 4 °C, respectively. Moreover, CHF/ST/HO at 4% and 6% of HO extract enhanced the sensory attributes of grilled un-inoculated chicken fillet. Thus, lyophilized HO extracts are promising antibacterial and antioxidant candidates in the chicken meat industry.

Indexed as

chicken safetynatural antimicrobialsnatural antioxidantsnatural preservativesphenolicsS. aureusseaweed extractsshelf-life

Identifiers

PMID36613239
PMCPMC9818820
OpenAlexW4312187280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.