Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613196›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Frédéric Dutheil, Tharwa Oueslati, Louis Delamarre, Joris Castanon, Caroline Maurin, Frédéric Chiambaretta, Julien S Baker, Ukadike C Ugbolue, Marek Zak, Ines Lakbar and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Parental knowledge-attitude-practice profiles in childhood myopia: a comprehensive evaluation integrated with clinical findings.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Frédéric DutheilPreventive and Occupational Medicine, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, CNRS, LaPSCo, Université Clermont Auvergne, WittyFit, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Tharwa OueslatiOphthalmology, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (CHU), 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Louis DelamarrePreventive and Occupational Medicine, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, CNRS, LaPSCo, Université Clermont Auvergne, WittyFit, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4051-3834
Joris CastanonOphthalmology, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (CHU), 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Caroline MaurinOphthalmology, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (CHU), 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Frédéric ChiambarettaOphthalmology, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (CHU), 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Julien S BakerCentre for Health and Exercise Science Research, Physical Education and Health, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-9093-7897
Ukadike C UgbolueSchool of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Glasgow G72 0LH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6640-4126
Marek ZakFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Physiotherapy, The Jan Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0881-9232
Ines LakbarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Marseille, Hopital Nord-Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13015 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0049-6248
Bruno PereiraBiostatitics, Clinical Research Direction, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (CHU), 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3778-7161
Valentin NavelOphthalmology, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (CHU), 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-345X
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRHong Kong Baptist University · HKJan Kochanowski University · PLUniversity of the West of Scotland · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyopia is a global public health problem affecting quality of life and work productivity. Data is scarce regarding the effects of near work on myopia. Providing a larger meta-analysis with life-long perspective, including adults and occupational exposure seemed needed.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Science Direct for studies reporting myopia prevalence in near work. Myopia was defined as a mean spherical equivalent ≤ -0.50 diopter. We performed a meta-analysis using random-effects model on myopia prevalence, myopia progression per year, and odds ratio (OR) of myopia in near work, completed by subgroup analyses and meta-regressions on patients' characteristics, type of work in adults, geographic zones, time and characteristics of near work.

resultsWe included 78 studies, representing a total of 254,037 participants, aged from 6 to 39 years. The global prevalence of myopia in near work was 35% (95% CI: 30 to 41%), with a prevalence of 31% (95% CI: 26 to 37%) in children and 46% (95% CI: 30 to 62%) in adults. Myopia progression was -0.39 diopters per year (-0.53 to -0.24 D/year), ranging from -0.44 (-0.57 to -0.31) in children to -0.25 D/year (-0.56 to 0.06) in adults. The odds of myopia in workers exposed vs. non-exposed to near work were increased by 26% (18 to 34%), by 31% (21 to 42%) in children and 21% (6 to 35%) in adults. Prevalence of myopia was higher in adults compared to children (Coefficient 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.27).

conclusionsNear work conditions, including occupational exposure in adults, could be associated with myopia. Targeted prevention should be implemented in the workplace.

Indexed as

MyopiaQuality of LifeAdultChildHumansOdds RatioPrevalenceRefraction, Ocularepidemiologymyopianear workoccupationpublic health

Identifiers

PMID36613196
PMCPMC9820324
OpenAlexW4313587906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.