Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613137›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Effect of Amnioguard and Biomesh GTR Membranes with Novabone Putty in the Treatment of Periodontal Osseous Defects-A Communication.

Priyankar Chakraborthy, Potluri Leela Ravishankar, Anbukumari Vadivelu Saravanan, Khalid J Alzahrani, Ibrahim F Halawan, Saleh Alshammeri, Mrim M Alnfiai, Hosam Ali Baeshen, Sarah Yasser M Qattan, Ammar Almarghlani and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Priyankar ChakraborthyDepartment of Periodontology, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College & Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603203, India.
Potluri Leela RavishankarDepartment of Periodontology, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College & Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603203, India.
Anbukumari Vadivelu SaravananDepartment of Periodontology, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College & Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603203, India.
Khalid J AlzahraniDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6688-0106
Ibrahim F HalawanDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6632-0646
Saleh AlshammeriDepartment of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0179-0767
Mrim M AlnfiaiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Hosam Ali BaeshenDepartment of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah Yasser M QattanPrivate Practice, Jeddah 21586, Saudi Arabia.
Ammar AlmarghlaniDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2259-3401
Sunanda Rao KarkalaDepartment of Periodontology, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College & Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603203, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9186-4805
Anila NeelakandanDepartment of Periodontology, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College & Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603203, India.
Shankargouda PatilCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-5497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Guided tissue regeneration was an effective surgical procedure in the management of intrabony defects and has undergone a number of changes in terms of materials and techniques. The aim of this study is to compare AmnioGuard and BioMesh in combination with NovaBone putty in intrabony defects. (2) Methodology: Ten patients who needed regenerative periodontal therapy were randomly allocated into two groups based on the inclusion criteria. These patients were subjected to phase I therapy followed by which Group A patients were treated with AmnioGuard + NovaBone putty whereas Group B with BioMesh + NovaBone putty. The clinical indices were obtained at baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-operatively while radiographic parameters were obtained at 6 months post-op. (3) Results & Conclusion: At six months after surgery, Group B (33% bone gain) showed a statistically significant change from Group A (16% bone gain) in both the clinical and radiographic measures (

Indexed as

Bone and BonesCeramicsBone RegenerationCommunicationFollow-Up StudiesHumansMembranes, ArtificialTreatment OutcomeBioglassMembranes, ArtificialAmnioGuardBioMeshNovaBone puttyperiodontal regeneration

Identifiers

PMID36613137
PMCPMC9819468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.