Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613083›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Bridging the Gap between Research and the Community: Implementing Physical and Cognitive Interventions to Improve Spontaneous Walking Speed in Older Adults.

Kristell Pothier, Navin Kaushal, Tudor Vrinceanu, Maxime Lussier, Nathalie Bailly, Francis Comte, Thien Tuong Minh Vu, Nicolas Berryman, Louis Bherer

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristell PothierDepartment of Psychology, PAVeA Laboratory (EA 2114), University of Tours, 37041 Tours, France.
Navin KaushalDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Tudor VrinceanuResearch Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3W 1W5, Canada.
Maxime LussierDepartment of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2753-1189
Nathalie BaillyDepartment of Psychology, PAVeA Laboratory (EA 2114), University of Tours, 37041 Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9421-7862
Francis ComteResearch Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3W 1W5, Canada.
Thien Tuong Minh VuDepartment of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
Nicolas BerrymanResearch Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3W 1W5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-7986
Louis BhererResearch Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3W 1W5, Canada.
Montreal Heart Institute · CAUniversité de Tours · FRCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAIndiana University Health · USInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

CIHR 136859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of interventions to enhance mobility in ecological settings remain understudied. This study was developed to evaluate the feasibility of training methods in a community centre and to evaluate their impact on mobility outcomes. Fifty-four participants were randomized to one of three 12-week training programs (three times/week): aerobic (AE), gross motor abilities (GMA) or cognitive (COG). Feasibility was evaluated by calculating adherence, feedback from participants and long-term participation. The impact of these interventions on mobility was assessed by comparing pre- and post-program on Timed-up-and-go (TUG) and spontaneous walking speed (SWS) performances. Results showed relatively high rates of adherence (85.1%) and long-term participation (66.7%), along with favorable feedbacks. SWS significantly improved in COG (0.10 ± 0.11 m.s

Indexed as

ExerciseWalking SpeedAgedCognitionFeasibility StudiesHumansWalkingcognitive trainingcommunity centrefeasibility studyphysical interventionswalking speed

Identifiers

PMID36613083
PMCPMC9819086
OpenAlexW4313472877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.