Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613035›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Assessment of the Ecological Compensation Standards for Cross-Basin Water Diversion Projects from the Perspective of Main Headwater and Receiver Areas.

Yubing Wang, Kai Zhu, Xiao Xiong, Jianuo Yin, Haoran Yan, Yuan Zhang, Hai Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yubing WangHubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
Kai ZhuHubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4041-2918
Xiao XiongEcological Environment Monitoring Center of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550081, China.
Jianuo YinHubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
Haoran YanHubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
Yuan ZhangEcological Environment Monitoring Center Station of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430071, China.
Hai LiuHubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
Hubei University · CNBeijing Municipal Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aims to explore how to develop reasonable ecological compensation standards to improve the effectiveness of water diversion projects. Watershed ecological compensation is an important means to coordinate watershed protection and development and, additionally, compensation standard accounting is the core issue of ecological compensation. The previous literature has mainly calculated watershed ecological compensation standards from a single perspective, such as the main headwater or receiver areas, meaning the interests of another under-appreciated area would inevitably be ignored. The calculation results of different perspectives and methods vary greatly, directly affecting the implementation of watershed ecological compensation mechanisms. In this paper, the world's largest water diversion project, the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, was selected as the study area. The total cost correction model was selected from the perspective of the main headwater areas. The water resources input-output model was selected from the perspective of the receiver areas to evaluate the ecological compensation criteria and compare the differences between the two models. The results show that the ecological compensation standards based on the perspective of water source areas are mainly influenced by the ecological construction expenditures and industrial opportunity cost losses in the watershed, with higher compensation costs in the early period but a more moderate growth trend in the later period. The ecological compensation standards based on the perspective of the receiver areas increase with the annual increase in project water diversion, with a low compensation cost in the early period, but a faster growth trend in the later period. The ecological compensation standards calculated by different perspectives and methods differ significantly; the main contribution of this paper is to enrich the ecological compensation research on cross-basin water diversion projects from multiple perspectives.

Indexed as

EcosystemWaterChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesIndustryRiversWater ResourcesWater SupplyWatercross-basin water diversion projectsecological compensation standardpayment for ecosystem servicessouth-to-north water diversion project

Identifiers

PMID36613035
PMCPMC9819099
OpenAlexW4313471846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.