Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612911›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Neurobehavioral Alterations from Noise Exposure in Animals: A Systematic Review.

Giulio Arcangeli, Lucrezia Ginevra Lulli, Veronica Traversini, Simone De Sio, Emanuele Cannizzaro, Raymond Paul Galea, Nicola Mucci

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vibrissal sensing in mammals in a changing world.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Different considerations in economic impacts of aircraft noise.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giulio ArcangeliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Lucrezia Ginevra LulliOccupational Medicine School, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4342-966X
Veronica TraversiniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Simone De SioR.U. of Occupational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-3941
Emanuele CannizzaroDepartment ProMISE, University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7070-209X
Raymond Paul GaleaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta.
Nicola MucciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-1035
University of Florence · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Malta · MTUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystems are increasingly involved and influenced by human activities, which are ever-increasing. These activities are mainly due to vehicular, air and sea transportation, thus causing possible repercussions on the fauna that exists there. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the possible consequences that these activities may have in the field of animal neurobehavior, with special emphasis on the species involved, the most common environment concerned, the noise source and the disturbance that is caused. This research includes articles published in the major databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Sciences); the online search yielded 1901 references. After selection, 49 articles (14 reviews and 35 original articles) were finally scrutinized. The main problems that were reported were in relation to movement, reproduction, offspring care and foraging. In live experiments carried out, the repercussions on the marine environment mainly concerned altered swimming, shallower descents, less foraging and an escape reaction for fear of cetaceans and fish. In birds, alterations in foraging, vocalizations and nests were noted; laboratory studies, on the other hand, carried out on small mammals, highlighted spatio-temporal cognitive alterations and memory loss. In conclusion, it appears that greater attention to all ecosystems should be given as soon as possible so as to try to achieve a balance between human activity and the well-being of terrestrial fauna.

Indexed as

EcosystemMammalsAnimalsBirdsHumansNoiseReproductionacoustic pollutionanimalsenvironmentexposurefaunaneurobehavioral disordersnoisepreventionrisk

Identifiers

PMID36612911
PMCPMC9819367
OpenAlexW4313360809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.