ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Ecological Momentary Assessment of Masseter Muscle Activity in Patients with Bruxism.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factors Associated with Complications in Fixed Partial Dentures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Temporal patterns of bruxism behaviors: multiple day recording with portable electromyography.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Polysomnographic and Electromyographic Evaluation of Sleep Bruxism in Young Colombian Adults: Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Occlusal Overloads on Complications in Fixed Prosthetic Dentures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Stress Evaluation in Endodontically Treated Virtual Teeth Restored with Composite Fillings and Cast or Fiberglass Posts-A Finite Element Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Oral Clinical and Radiological Signs of Excessive Occlusal Forces in Bruxism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Non-Instrumental and Instrumental Tools Validity in Bruxism Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Role of Occlusal Appliances in Reducing Masseter Electromyographic Activity in Bruxism.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Patients' Satisfaction after the Treatment of Moderate Sleep Apnea and Nocturnal Bruxism with Botox or/and Thermoformed Occlusal Splints: A Pilot Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Ambulatory devices to detect sleep bruxism: a narrative review.Australian dental journal · 2024Review
- Study Regarding the Monitoring of Nocturnal Bruxism in Children and Adolescents Using Bruxoff Device.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Neuromuscular and occlusion analysis to evaluate the efficacy of three splints on patients with bruxism.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Aspects of Dental Occlusion Assessed with the T-Scan System among a Group of Romanian Dental Students in a Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Bruxism in Children and Adolescents and its Association with Some Possible Aetiological Factors.Current health sciences journalArticle
- Modifications of the articular eminence inclination in association with the loss of occlusal support in the molar area. A cone-beam computed tomography study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the International Bruxism Consensus, bruxism refers to the activity of the masticatory muscles reflecting contraction disorders, regardless of whether it is during sleep (SB) or an awake (AB) state. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the activity of the masseter muscle by surface electromyographic (sEMG) recordings. This study was performed on 20 participants with self-reported “possible bruxism” (study group) and 20 participants with no self-reported bruxism (control group); all participants underwent an evaluation of the masseter muscle activity using the dia-BRUXO device, which provides numerical parameters regarding sEMG (the total duration and the type of bruxism specific events, the effort made by the masticatory muscles during the recording period, and the personal bruxism index of each participant). Participants from the study group presented more clenching events during AB, three times more frequent than the control group (p = 0.002, Mann−Whitney U test); for SB, the frequency of clenching and grinding events was comparable within the study group, being more frequent than for the control group; the mean value of the effort index was higher for AB (1.177%) than SB (0.470%) and the same for the duration index, with a mean value of 2.788% for AB and 1.054% for SB. All participants from the control group presented reduced values for all acquired parameters. Overall, the personal bruxism index in AB was approximately four times higher for the study group (2.251%) compared to the control group (0.585%) (p < 0.005, Mann−Whitney U test). Similar values were obtained for SB. All participants with “possible bruxism” from the study group presented a higher activity of the masseter muscle, which is specific for bruxism, thus being defined as “definite bruxism”.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.