Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612902›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Ecological Momentary Assessment of Masseter Muscle Activity in Patients with Bruxism.

Diana Elena Vlăduțu, Mihaela Ionescu, Răzvan Mercuț, Lorenzo Noveri, Grigore Lăzărescu, Sanda Mihaela Popescu, Monica Scrieciu, Horia Octavian Manolea, Monica Mihaela Iacov Crăițoiu, Alin Gabriel Ionescu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana Elena VlăduțuDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Mihaela IonescuDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Răzvan MercuțDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Lorenzo NoveriStudio Dentistico Noveri-Minelli, 18038 Sanremo, Italy.
Grigore LăzărescuDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Sanda Mihaela PopescuDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3011-6322
Monica ScrieciuDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Horia Octavian ManoleaDepartment of Dental Materials, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Monica Mihaela Iacov CrăițoiuDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Alin Gabriel IonescuDepartment of Medical History, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Veronica MercuțDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the International Bruxism Consensus, bruxism refers to the activity of the masticatory muscles reflecting contraction disorders, regardless of whether it is during sleep (SB) or an awake (AB) state. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the activity of the masseter muscle by surface electromyographic (sEMG) recordings. This study was performed on 20 participants with self-reported “possible bruxism” (study group) and 20 participants with no self-reported bruxism (control group); all participants underwent an evaluation of the masseter muscle activity using the dia-BRUXO device, which provides numerical parameters regarding sEMG (the total duration and the type of bruxism specific events, the effort made by the masticatory muscles during the recording period, and the personal bruxism index of each participant). Participants from the study group presented more clenching events during AB, three times more frequent than the control group (p = 0.002, Mann−Whitney U test); for SB, the frequency of clenching and grinding events was comparable within the study group, being more frequent than for the control group; the mean value of the effort index was higher for AB (1.177%) than SB (0.470%) and the same for the duration index, with a mean value of 2.788% for AB and 1.054% for SB. All participants from the control group presented reduced values for all acquired parameters. Overall, the personal bruxism index in AB was approximately four times higher for the study group (2.251%) compared to the control group (0.585%) (p < 0.005, Mann−Whitney U test). Similar values were obtained for SB. All participants with “possible bruxism” from the study group presented a higher activity of the masseter muscle, which is specific for bruxism, thus being defined as “definite bruxism”.

Indexed as

BruxismEcological Momentary AssessmentElectromyographyHumansMasseter MuscleMasticatory MusclesbruxismclenchingEMGgrindingmasseter musclemuscular contractions

Identifiers

PMID36612902
PMCPMC9819829
OpenAlexW4313362038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.