Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612873›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Direct Air Capture of CO

Jing Su, Hui Henry Teng, Xiang Wan, Jianchao Zhang, Cong-Qiang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing SuSchool of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4997-387X
Hui Henry TengSchool of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Xiang WanKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, The Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jianchao ZhangSchool of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Cong-Qiang LiuSchool of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the consensus that keeping global temperature rise within 1.5 °C above pre-industrial level by 2100 reduces the chance for climate change to reach the point of no return, the newest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report warns that the existing commitment of greenhouse gas emission reduction is only enough to contain the warming to 3-4 °C by 2100. The harsh reality not only calls for speedier deployment of existing CO

Indexed as

Carbon DioxidePhytoplanktonBiodiversityCarbonatesNitratesSeawaterTemperatureCarbonatesCarbon DioxideNitratescarbonate alkalinitycarbon removal strategiesclimate changeCO2 sequestrationdirect air capturenitrate assimilation

Identifiers

PMID36612873
PMCPMC9820007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.