Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612839›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Novel Procedure for Knee Flexion Angle Estimation Based on Functionally Defined Coordinate Systems and Independent of the Marker Landmarks.

Andrea Ancillao, Arno Verduyn, Maxim Vochten, Erwin Aertbeliën, Joris De Schutter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Influence of Foot Morphology on the Center of Pressure Pattern in Patients with Down Syndrome.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea AncillaoRobotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3401-967X
Arno VerduynRobotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Maxim VochtenRobotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5070-846X
Erwin AertbeliënRobotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Joris De SchutterRobotics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Flanders Make (Belgium) · BETU Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee angles are kinematic quantities that are commonly presented in gait analysis reports. They are typically calculated as the relative angles between the anatomical coordinate systems rigidly attached to the femur and the tibia. To give these angles a biomechanical meaning, the coordinate systems must be defined with respect to some anatomical landmarks. For example, if one axis of the joint coordinate systems is directed along the knee flexion/extension axis, then the relative angle assumes the meaning of flexion/extension angle. Defining accurate anatomical coordinate systems is not an easy task, because it requires skills in marker placement, landmark identification and definition of a biomechanical model. In this paper, we present a novel method to (i) functionally define two coordinate systems attached to femur and tibia and (ii) functionally calculate the knee angle based on the relative differential kinematics between the previously defined coordinate systems. As the main limitation, this method is unable to provide an absolute measurement of the knee flexion/extension angle; however, it is able to accurately capture and display the relative angular motion of the knee. We show that our method produced consistent results even when the measured coordinate systems were randomly modified, removing any anatomical referencing. The proposed method has the advantage of being independent/invariant of the choice of the original coordinate systems of the femur and tibia, removing the need for accurate marker placement. Some major consequences are that (i) the markers may be placed on optimal landmarks, for example, minimizing the soft tissue artifacts or improving the subject's comfort, and (ii) there is no need for anatomical calibration when technical marker clusters/triads are used.

Indexed as

KneeKnee JointFemurGait AnalysisHumansRange of Motion, ArticularTibiabiomechanicsgait analysisinvariantknee angleknee flexionmotion capture

Identifiers

PMID36612839
PMCPMC9819753
OpenAlexW4313327096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.