Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612776›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Multi-Risk Assessment of Mine Lithium Battery Fire Based on Quantitative Factor Characterization.

Kuikui Li, Yanming Wang, Yongchang Zhang, Shasha Wang, Xiangyu Zou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kuikui LiSchool of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Yanming WangSchool of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0304-0978
Yongchang ZhangSchool of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Shasha WangSchool of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Xiangyu ZouSchool of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
China University of Mining and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a large number of new energy is employed as the driving force for the operation and transportation machinery of underground space projects, the lithium battery load in confined spaces, such as working faces, roadways and tunnels increases in geometric progression, and the coupled risks of heat damage and smoke poisoning caused by possible fires become more serious. In this paper, experimental and numerical methods were implemented to study the propagation mechanism of heat- and mass-induced disasters under catastrophic conditions, and a quantitative characterization model of multiple risk factors of thermal runaway and toxic gas diffusion of battery fire was proposed. The fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) was conducted to calculate and grade the risk of lithium battery fire in a typical mine working face under multiple factors, including hazard source, personnel, working environment and emergency response. In addition, a quantitative early warning and control model was established for identified high-risk probability events. The results promote the quantitative and scientific development of multiple risk assessment and decision-making of confined space fire.

Indexed as

FiresLithiumRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSmokeLithiumSmokelithium batterymine firequantitative characterizationrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID36612776
PMCPMC9819232
OpenAlexW4313414311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.