Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612755›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

COVID-19 Public Opinion: A Twitter Healthcare Data Processing Using Machine Learning Methodologies.

Shweta Agrawal, Sanjiv Kumar Jain, Shruti Sharma, Ajay Khatri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shweta AgrawalInstitute of Advanced Computing, SAGE University, Indore 452010, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0372-6128
Sanjiv Kumar JainElectrical Engineering Department, Medi-Caps University, Indore 453331, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8942-7681
Shruti SharmaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indore Institute of Science &Technology, Indore 453332, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4389-1432
Ajay KhatriBellurbis Technologies Private Limited, Indore 452001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6393-6952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has shattered the whole world, and due to this, millions of people have posted their sentiments toward the pandemic on different social media platforms. This resulted in a huge information flow on social media and attracted many research studies aimed at extracting useful information to understand the sentiments. This paper analyses data imported from the Twitter API for the healthcare sector, emphasizing sub-domains, such as vaccines, post-COVID-19 health issues and healthcare service providers. The main objective of this research is to analyze machine learning models for classifying the sentiments of people and analyzing the direction of polarity by considering the views of the majority of people. The inferences drawn from this analysis may be useful for concerned authorities as they work to make appropriate policy decisions and strategic decisions. Various machine learning models were developed to extract the actual emotions, and results show that the support vector machine model outperforms with an average accuracy of 82.67% compared with the logistic regression, random forest, multinomial naïve Bayes and long short-term memory models, which present 78%, 77%, 68.67% and 75% accuracy, respectively.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaBayes TheoremDelivery of Health CareHumansMachine LearningPandemicsPublic Opinionaccuracyartificial intelligenceclassificationhealthcaremachine learningpolaritysentiment analysissocial media

Identifiers

PMID36612755
PMCPMC9819913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.