Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612689›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Subjective Outcome Evaluation of Instructional Videos in Leadership Education.

Xiang Li, Daniel T L Shek, Tingyin Wong, Lu Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiang LiDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.
Daniel T L ShekDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3359-6229
Tingyin WongDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3919-7889
Lu YuDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3003-8432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were to examine the psychometric properties of two subjective outcome evaluation tools measuring students' perceptions of 24 instructional videos and to understand the profiles of students' perceptions of the videos. Online teaching and learning played an important role when school lockdown measures were imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. To facilitate online teaching in a college-level leadership education subject, we developed and piloted 24 instructional videos, including 15 animated videos and 9 case-based videos, in the 2021/22 academic year. To understand students' perceptions of the videos, we developed two subjective outcome evaluation scales (one for the animated videos and another for the case-based videos) to assess the subjective perceptions of 1308 students. Results showed that the developed tools possessed good psychometric properties, including factorial, convergent and discriminant validity. The findings of this study also revealed the students had positive attitudes towards the developed videos, including positive perceptions of the videos' design and the benefits gained from watching them. The present study suggests teachers can meaningfully use the 24 instructional videos in the context of leadership education in higher education.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlHumansLeadershipLearninghigher educationinstructional videosleadership educationonline learningsubjective outcome evaluation

Identifiers

PMID36612689
PMCPMC9819560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.