Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612657›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Critical Care Providers' Moral Distress: Frequency, Burden, and Potential Resources.

Dominik Hinzmann, Katharina Schütte-Nütgen, Arndt Büssing, Olaf Boenisch, Hans-Jörg Busch, Christoph Dodt, Patrick Friederich, Matthias Kochanek, Guido Michels, Eckhard Frick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dominik HinzmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-352X
Katharina Schütte-NütgenDepartment of Palliative Care, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Arndt BüssingQuality of Life, Spirituality and Coping, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5025-7950
Olaf BoenischDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Hans-Jörg BuschDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph DodtEmergency Department, München Klinik, 81925 Munich, Germany.
Patrick FriederichDepartment of Intensive Care, München Klinik, 81925 Munich, Germany.
Matthias KochanekDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4766-4651
Guido MichelsEmergency Department, Sankt Antonius Hospital, 52249 Eschweiler, Germany.
Eckhard FrickSchool of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 80333 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6753-1004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical Care Providers (CCPs) experience situations that challenge their ethics and professional standards and may entail moral distress (MD).

aimTo analyze MD perceived by CCPs in intensive care units (ICUs) or emergency departments (EDs) and further clarify whether CCPs who rely on spiritual resources differ in their perception of MD from those who do not utilize these resources.

methodsA cross-sectional anonymous survey was administered using a modified version of the German language version of the Moral Distress Scale (MDS) with 2 × 12 items to assess the frequency and the respective perceived burden of specific situations by applying a 5-point Likert scale. Explorative factor analysis was performed and the sub-constructs of the respective items regarding MD frequency and burden were identified. Job burden and professional satisfaction were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS) and a four-point Likert scale, respectively. The 15-item SpREUK questionnaire was applied to measure spiritual attitudes and behaviours and to differentiate between religious and spiritual persons. Data from 385 German-speaking CCPs were included (55% physicians, 45% nurses).

resultsConflict situations are similar for physicians and nurses although they are perceived as more burdensome by nurses. Among physicians, the MDS factor Looking away/Resignation scores highest for assistant physician residents, whereas distress caused by looking away is more often perceived by specialist physicians without a managerial position. Work satisfaction is inversely associated with MD and emotional exhaustion is positively associated with it. Participants' spirituality is marginally associated with MD. The best predictors of both MD frequency and burden are emotional exhaustion with further influences of work satisfaction, being a nurse, and being a non-believer on the frequency of MD perception. Being a nurse, participants' experience in ICU/ED, and being of the male gender are further predictors of MD burden.

conclusionsMD is experienced differently by different groups of CCPs depending on their place in the hierarchy of responsibility. As MD perception is best predicted by emotional exhaustion, these situations should be avoided. Although some CCPs may rely on spiritual resources, all need individual and team support to cope with MD.

Indexed as

MoralsStress, PsychologicalAttitude of Health PersonnelCritical CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansJob SatisfactionMaleSurveys and Questionnairesemergency departmentintensive care unitmoral distressmoral sufferingspirituality

Identifiers

PMID36612657
PMCPMC9819312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.