Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612631›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Drug Recommendation from Diagnosis Codes: Classification vs. Collaborative Filtering Approaches.

Apichat Sae-Ang, Sawrawit Chairat, Natchada Tansuebchueasai, Orapan Fumaneeshoat, Thammasin Ingviya, Sitthichok Chaichulee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Recognizing and preventing unacknowledged prescribing errors associated with polypharmacy.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Apichat Sae-AngCollege of Digital Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
Sawrawit ChairatDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4629-3924
Natchada TansuebchueasaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4776-9610
Orapan FumaneeshoatDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1084-1837
Thammasin IngviyaDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8894-3817
Sitthichok ChaichuleeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-7925
Prince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over time, large amounts of clinical data have accumulated in electronic health records (EHRs), making it difficult for healthcare professionals to navigate and make patient-centered decisions. This underscores the need for healthcare recommendation systems that help medical professionals make faster and more accurate decisions. This study addresses drug recommendation systems that generate an appropriate list of drugs that match patients' diagnoses. Currently, recommendations are manually prepared by physicians, but this is difficult for patients with multiple comorbidities. We explored approaches to drug recommendations based on elderly patients with diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease who visited primary-care clinics and often had multiple conditions. We examined both collaborative filtering approaches and traditional machine-learning classifiers. The hybrid model between the two yielded a recall at 5 of 76.61%, a precision at 5 of 46.20%, a macro-averaged area under the curve of 74.52%, and an average physician agreement of 47.50%. Although collaborative filtering is widely used in recommendation systems, our results showed that it consistently underperformed traditional classification. Collaborative filtering was sensitive to class imbalances and favored the more popular classes. This study highlighted challenges that need to be addressed when developing recommendation systems in EHRs.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMedication SystemsAgedAlgorithmsComorbidityHumansMachine Learningclassificaitoncollaborative filteringdiseaseselectronic medical prescriptionsmachine learningrecommender systems

Identifiers

PMID36612631
PMCPMC9819759
OpenAlexW4312201996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.