Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612612›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Frailty Screening in the Emergency Department: Comparing the Variable Indicative of Placement Risk, Clinical Frailty Scale and PRISMA-7.

Rónán O'Caoimh, Jane McGauran, Mark R O'Donovan, Ciara Gillman, Anne O'Hea, Mary Hayes, Kieran O'Connor, Elizabeth Moloney, Megan Alcock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Development of a Novel Frailty Trigger for Use at Triage in the Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Impact of Frailty on Healthcare Outcomes after Cardioembolic Ischaemic Stroke Due to Atrial Fibrillation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rónán O'CaoimhMercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1499-673X
Jane McGauranMercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Mark R O'DonovanClinical Research Facility Cork, University College Cork, Mercy University Hospital, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Ciara GillmanMercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Anne O'HeaMercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Mary HayesMercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Kieran O'ConnorMercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Elizabeth MoloneyClinical Research Facility Cork, University College Cork, Mercy University Hospital, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Megan AlcockMercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Mercy University Hospital · IEUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prompt recognition of frailty in the emergency department (ED) is important to identify patients at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Despite this, few studies examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening instruments for frailty, instead focusing on predictive validity. We compared three commonly used, short frailty screens to an independent comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in an urban University Hospital ED. Consecutive attendees aged ≥70 years were screened by trained raters, blind to the CGA, with the Variable Indicative of Placement risk (VIP), 3 and 4-item versions, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and PRISMA-7. Accuracy was measured from the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). In total, 197 patients were included, median age 79 (±10); 46% were female. Half (49%) were confirmed as frail after CGA. All instruments differentiated frail from non-frail states, although the CFS (AUROC: 0.91) and PRISMA-7 (AUROC: 0.90) had higher accuracy compared to the VIP-4 (AUROC: 0.84) and VIP-3 (AUROC: 0.84). The CFS was significantly more accurate than the VIP-3 (

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleclinical frailty scalediagnostic accuracyemergency departmentfrailtyPRISMA-7screeningvariable indicative of placement risk

Identifiers

PMID36612612
PMCPMC9819173
OpenAlexW4312202094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.