Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612563›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Influencing Factors and Symbiotic Mechanism of the Integration of Medical Care and Disease Prevention during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Public Hospital Employees.

Zhen Wu, Huiyi Tian, Dongjian Xu, Jiaying Chen, Yaqi Hu, Xiaohe Wang, Siyu Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Current Status and Effect Pathways of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Medical Care and Prevention Integration Among Medical Professionals].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhen WuSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Huiyi TianSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Dongjian XuSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Jiaying ChenSchool of Public Administration, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Yaqi HuSchool of Public Administration, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Xiaohe WangSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Siyu ZhouSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 outbreak has accelerated the huge difference between medical care and disease prevention in Chinese medical institutions. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the symbiotic units, environments, models, and effects of the integration of medical care and disease prevention. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 762 employees of public hospitals in 11 cities in Zhejiang Province by random stratified sampling. We analyzed the influence paths of elements in the mechanism of integration of medical care and disease prevention and the mediating effect of symbiotic models among symbiotic units, symbiotic environments, and effects on this integration. Results: The path coefficient of the symbiotic unit on the symbiosis model was 0.46 (p < 0.001), the path coefficient of the symbiotic environment on the symbiosis model was 0.52 (p < 0.001). The path coefficient of the symbiotic unit and the environment was 0.91 (p < 0.001). The symbiotic models exhibited a partial mediation effect between symbiotic units and the effect of this integration. Sobel test = 3.27, β = 0.152, and the mediating effect accounted for 34.6%. Conclusions: It is suggested that health policymakers and public hospital managers should provide sufficient symbiotic units, establish collaborative symbiotic models, and improve the effects of integration of medical care and disease prevention in public hospitals.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, PublicHumansPandemicsSymbiosisintegrationmediating effectmedical care and disease preventionpublic healthsymbiotic

Identifiers

PMID36612563
PMCPMC9819979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.