Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612490›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Swallow Detection with Acoustics and Accelerometric-Based Wearable Technology: A Scoping Review.

Bryan Pak-Hei So, Tim Tin-Chun Chan, Liangchao Liu, Calvin Chi-Kong Yip, Hyo-Jung Lim, Wing-Kai Lam, Duo Wai-Chi Wong, Daphne Sze Ki Cheung, James Chung-Wai Cheung

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bryan Pak-Hei SoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Tim Tin-Chun ChanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Liangchao LiuPhysical Education Department, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China.
Calvin Chi-Kong YipSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-5393-6609
Hyo-Jung LimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Wing-Kai LamSports Information and External Affairs Centre, Hong Kong Sports Institute, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-8692-2206
Duo Wai-Chi WongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-8805-1157
Daphne Sze Ki CheungSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-5651-9352
James Chung-Wai CheungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-7446-0569
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKHong Kong Footwear Federation · CNTung Wah College · CNUniversity of International Business and Economics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swallowing disorders, especially dysphagia, might lead to malnutrition and dehydration and could potentially lead to fatal aspiration. Benchmark swallowing assessments, such as videofluoroscopy or endoscopy, are expensive and invasive. Wearable technologies using acoustics and accelerometric sensors could offer opportunities for accessible and home-based long-term assessment. Identifying valid swallow events is the first step before enabling the technology for clinical applications. The objective of this review is to summarize the evidence of using acoustics-based and accelerometric-based wearable technology for swallow detection, in addition to their configurations, modeling, and assessment protocols. Two authors independently searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Eleven (n = 11) articles were eligible for review. In addition to swallowing events, non-swallowing events were also recognized by dry (saliva) swallowing, reading, yawning, etc., while some attempted to classify the types of swallowed foods. Only about half of the studies reported that the device attained an accuracy level of >90%, while a few studies reported poor performance with an accuracy of <60%. The reviewed articles were at high risk of bias because of the small sample size and imbalanced class size problem. There was high heterogeneity in assessment protocol that calls for standardization for swallowing, dry-swallowing and non-swallowing tasks. There is a need to improve the current wearable technology and the credibility of relevant research for accurate swallowing detection before translating into clinical screening for dysphagia and other swallowing disorders.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersAcousticsDeglutitionEndoscopyHumansdeglutition disorderdysphagiaeating disordermHealthotorhinolaryngology

Identifiers

PMID36612490
PMCPMC9819201
OpenAlexW4313328820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.