Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612467›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Development of Key Principles and Best Practices for Co-Design in Health with First Nations Australians.

Kate Anderson, Alana Gall, Tamara Butler, Khwanruethai Ngampromwongse, Debra Hector, Scott Turnbull, Kerri Lucas, Caroline Nehill, Anna Boltong, Dorothy Keefe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. From Beliefs to Action: Dietitians' Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability and a Pathway to Planetary Health Framework for Food System Change.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Indigenous Cancer Survivors in Peer Education and Community Knowledge Exchange: A Scoping Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  5. Better Healthcare Together: Co-Designing a Framework for Health Service Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. BMJ open · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Scope and impact of a First Nations cancer coordinator role: perspectives of multidisciplinary cancer staff.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recommendations for Reporting Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Screening Tool Use With Pregnant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  17. The Luminos Project: Co-Designing a Short-Stay Suicide Support Model for Young People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kate AndersonSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1214-2001
Alana GallSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.
Tamara ButlerSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.
Khwanruethai NgampromwongseSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0915-3770
Debra HectorCancer Australia, Sydney 2010, Australia.
Scott TurnbullCancer Australia, Sydney 2010, Australia.
Kerri LucasCancer Australia, Sydney 2010, Australia.
Caroline NehillCancer Australia, Sydney 2010, Australia.
Anna BoltongCancer Australia, Sydney 2010, Australia.
Dorothy KeefeCancer Australia, Sydney 2010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9377-431X
Gail GarveySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5065-5716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile co-design offers potential for equitably engaging First Nations Australians in findings solutions to redressing prevailing disparities, appropriate applications of co-design must align with First Nations Australians' culture, values, and worldviews. To achieve this, robust, culturally grounded, and First Nations-determined principles and practices to guide co-design approaches are required.

aimsThis project aimed to develop a set of key principles and best practices for co-design in health with First Nations Australians.

methodsA First Nations Australian co-led team conducted a series of Online Yarning Circles (OYC) and individual Yarns with key stakeholders to guide development of key principles and best practice approaches for co-design with First Nations Australians. The Yarns were informed by the findings of a recently conducted comprehensive review, and a Collaborative Yarning Methodology was used to iteratively develop the principles and practices.

resultsA total of 25 stakeholders participated in the Yarns, with 72% identifying as First Nations Australian. Analysis led to a set of six key principles and twenty-seven associated best practices for co-design in health with First Nations Australians. The principles were: First Nations leadership; Culturally grounded approach; Respect; Benefit to community; Inclusive partnerships; and Transparency and evaluation.

conclusionsTogether, these principles and practices provide a valuable starting point for the future development of guidelines, toolkits, reporting standards, and evaluation criteria to guide applications of co-design with First Nations Australians.

Indexed as

Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesHealth Services, IndigenousAustraliaHumansPopulation GroupsAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplecancerco-designcommunity engagementFirst Nations peoplesparticipatory action research

Identifiers

PMID36612467
PMCPMC9819583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.