ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Convolutional Neural Network-Based ECG-Assisted Diagnosis for Coal Workers.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo process and extract electrocardiogram (ECG, ECG, or EKG) features using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to establish an ECG-assisted diagnosis model.
methodsCoal workers who underwent physical examinations at Gequan Mine Hospital and Dongpang Mine Hospital of Hebei Jizhong Energy from July 2020 to September 2020 were selected as the study subjects. The ECG images were preprocessed. We use Python software and convolutional neural network to establish ECG images recognition and classification model.We usecalibration curve, calibration-in-the-large, Brier score, specificity, sensitivity, F1 score, Kappa value, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) of ROC to evaluate the performance of the model.
resultsThe number of abnormal ECG results was 849, and the rate of abnormal results was 25.02%. The test set accuracies of the sinus bradycardia model, nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay model, myocardial ischemia model, and sinus tachycardia model were 97.66%, 96.49%, 93.62%, and 93.02%, respectively; sensitivities were 96.63%, 96.30%, 96.88% and 95.24%, respectively; specificities were 98.78%, 96.67%, 86.67%, and 90.90%, respectively; Brier scores were 0.03, 0.07, 0.09, and 0.11, respectively; Calibration-in-the-large values were 0.026, 0.110, 0.041, and 0.098, respectively.
conclusionsThe convolutional neural network model can accurately identify the main ECG abnormality types of coal workers. Additionally, the main ECG abnormalities in these coal company workers were sinus bradycardia, non-specific intraventricular conduction delay, myocardial ischemia, and sinus tachycardia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.