Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612319›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Metastasis-Directed Therapy Guided by Positron Emission Tomography: Does the Tracer Matter?

Francesco Lanfranchi, Liliana Belgioia, Michela Marcenaro, Elisa Zanardi, Giorgia Timon, Mattia Riondato, Veronica Giasotto, Jeries Paolo Zawaideh, Laura Tomasello, Guglielmo Mantica and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco LanfranchiDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Liliana BelgioiaDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0508-6344
Michela MarcenaroRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Elisa ZanardiAcademic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3252-4226
Giorgia TimonRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Mattia RiondatoNuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Veronica GiasottoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Jeries Paolo ZawaidehDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Laura TomaselloAcademic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Guglielmo ManticaDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Nataniele PiolPathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Marco BorghesiDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Paolo TraversoDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Camilla SatragnoRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Daniele PanarelloDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Claudio ScaffidiDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Andrea RomagnoliDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Sara Elena RebuzziMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, 17100 Savona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-6304
Angela CocoDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Bruno SpinaPathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Silvia MorbelliDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Gianmario SambucetiDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2979-6500
Carlo TerroneDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Salvina BarraRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Giuseppe FornariniMedical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-6572
Matteo BaucknehtDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-9116
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITOspedale San Paolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The superior diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 (PSMA) ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11) compared to [18F]F-Fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Prostate Cancer (PCa) is established. However, it is currently unclear if the added diagnostic accuracy actually translates into improved clinical outcomes in oligometastatic PCa patients treated with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-guided metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). The present study aimed to assess the impact of these two imaging techniques on Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in a real-world sample of oligometastatic PCa patients submitted to PET-guided MDT. Thirty-seven oligometastatic PCa patients treated with PET-guided MDT were retrospectively enrolled. MDT was guided by [18F]F-Fluorocholine PET/CT in eleven patients and by [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in twenty-six. Progression was defined as biochemical recurrence (BR), radiological progression at subsequent PET/CT imaging, clinical progression, androgen deprivation therapy initiation, or death. Clinical and imaging parameters were assessed as predictors of PFS. [18F]F-Fluorocholine PET-guided MDT was associated with significantly lower PFS compared to the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 group (median PFS, mPFS 15.47 months, 95% CI: 4.13−38.00 vs. 40.93 months, 95% CI: 40.93−40.93, respectively; p < 0.05). Coherently, the radiotracer used for PET-guided MDT resulted in predictive PFS at the univariate analysis, as well as the castration-resistant status at the time of MDT and the PSA nadir after MDT. However, in the multivariate analysis, castration resistance and PSA nadir after MDT remained the sole independent predictors of PFS. In conclusion, in the present proof-of-concept study, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 provided higher PFS rates than [18F]F-Fluorocholine imaging in oligometastatic PCa patients receiving PET-guided MDT. Although preliminary, this finding suggests that enlarging the “tip of the iceberg”, by detecting a major proportion of the submerged disease thanks to next-generation imaging may favourably impact the oncological outcome of oligometastatic PCa treated with MDT.

Indexed as

[18F]F-Fluorocholine[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11metastasis-directed therapyPET/CTprostate cancerSBRT

Identifiers

PMID36612319
PMCPMC9818332
OpenAlexW4313588477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.