Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612312›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Adherence to the CDK 4/6 Inhibitor Palbociclib and Omission of Dose Management Supported by Pharmacometric Modelling as Part of the OpTAT Study.

Carole Bandiera, Isabella Locatelli, Perrine Courlet, Evelina Cardoso, Khalil Zaman, Athina Stravodimou, Ana Dolcan, Apostolos Sarivalasis, Jean-Philippe Zurcher, Veronica Aedo-Lopez and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of healthcare professional-implemented interventions on adherence to oral targeted therapy in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carole BandieraSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9996-3100
Isabella LocatelliCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Perrine CourletCenter for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9114-7793
Evelina CardosoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7446-4594
Khalil ZamanDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2997-527X
Athina StravodimouDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9608-985X
Ana DolcanDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Apostolos SarivalasisDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-297X
Jean-Philippe ZurcherDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Veronica Aedo-LopezDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jennifer Dotta-CelioCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8500-817X
Solange PetersDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Monia GuidiCenter for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6419-9317
Anna Dorothea WagnerDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chantal CsajkaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0660-082X
Marie P SchneiderSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CH

Funding

Swiss Cancer Research Foundation HSR-4077-11-2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) palbociclib is administered orally and cyclically, causing medication adherence challenges. We evaluated components of adherence to palbociclib, its relationship with pharmacokinetics (PK), and drug-induced neutropenia. Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving palbociclib, delivered in electronic monitors (EM), were randomized 1:1 to an intervention and a control group. The intervention was a 12-month interprofessional medication adherence program (IMAP) along with monthly motivational interviews by a pharmacist. Implementation adherence was compared between groups using generalized estimating equation models, in which covariates were included. Model-based palbociclib PK and neutrophil profiles were simulated under real-life implementation scenarios: (1) optimal, (2) 2 doses omitted and caught up at cycle end. At 6 months, implementation was slightly higher and more stable in the intervention (n = 19) than in the control (n = 19) group, 99.2% and 97.3% (Δ1.95%, 95% CI 1.1−2.9%), respectively. The impact of the intervention was larger in patients diagnosed with MBC for >2 years (Δ3.6%, 95% CI 2.1−5.4%), patients who received >4 cycles before inclusion (Δ3.1%, 95% CI 1.7−4.8%) and patients >65 (Δ2.3%, 95% CI 0.8−3.6%). Simulations showed that 25% of patients had neutropenia grade ≥3 during the next cycle in scenario 1 versus 30% in scenario 2. Education and monitoring of patient CDK4/6i cycle management and adherence along with therapeutic drug monitoring can help clinicians improve prescription and decrease toxicity.

Indexed as

CDK4/6 inhibitorelectronic adherence monitoringinterprofessionalitymedication adherencemotivational interviewingneutropeniaoral anticancer therapypalbociclibpharmacists

Identifiers

PMID36612312
PMCPMC9818079
OpenAlexW4313585267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.