ArticleCancers2023
An Explainable AI-Enabled Framework for Interpreting Pulmonary Diseases from Chest Radiographs.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of explainable artificial intelligence in disease prediction: a systematic literature review and future research directions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- iS2C2: a cointelligent platform for mechanistic discovery of disease cellular crosstalk.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- MMCRAG-Resp: a multi-modal corrective retrieval-augmented generation framework for explainable respiratory disease reasoning.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- HybridCATNet: an explainable CNN-Transformer framework with early multi-channel fusion and uncertainty estimation for pneumonia detection from chest X-rays.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A reliable and explainable deep learning framework for clinical-grade endocrine disorder risk prediction and decision support.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Article
- Symmetry-guided explainable deep learning for colon cancer diagnosis: model benchmarking, cross-validation, statistical analysis, and explainability via ablation studies.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Computer-aided analysis of radiological images for cancer diagnosis: performance analysis on benchmark datasets, challenges, and directions.EJNMMI reports · 2024Review
- Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: Current State and Future Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Dung Beetle Optimization with Deep Feature Fusion Model for Lung Cancer Detection and Classification.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence is a key component of artificially intelligent systems that aim to explain the classification results. The classification results explanation is essential for automatic disease diagnosis in healthcare. The human respiration system is badly affected by different chest pulmonary diseases. Automatic classification and explanation can be used to detect these lung diseases. In this paper, we introduced a CNN-based transfer learning-based approach for automatically explaining pulmonary diseases, i.e., edema, tuberculosis, nodules, and pneumonia from chest radiographs. Among these pulmonary diseases, pneumonia, which COVID-19 causes, is deadly; therefore, radiographs of COVID-19 are used for the explanation task. We used the ResNet50 neural network and trained the network on extensive training with the COVID-CT dataset and the COVIDNet dataset. The interpretable model LIME is used for the explanation of classification results. Lime highlights the input image's important features for generating the classification result. We evaluated the explanation using radiologists' highlighted images and identified that our model highlights and explains the same regions. We achieved improved classification results with our fine-tuned model with an accuracy of 93% and 97%, respectively. The analysis of our results indicates that this research not only improves the classification results but also provides an explanation of pulmonary diseases with advanced deep-learning methods. This research would assist radiologists with automatic disease detection and explanations, which are used to make clinical decisions and assist in diagnosing and treating pulmonary diseases in the early stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.