Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612233›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Clinical Usefulness of Surgical Resection Including the Complementary Use of Radiofrequency Ablation for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hideko Ohama, Atsushi Hiraoka, Fujimasa Tada, Kanako Kato, Yoshiko Fukunishi, Emi Yanagihara, Masaya Kato, Hironobu Saneto, Hirofumi Izumoto, Hidetaro Ueki and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hideko OhamaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1882-824X
Atsushi HiraokaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1989-0480
Fujimasa TadaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Kanako KatoGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Yoshiko FukunishiGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Emi YanagiharaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Masaya KatoGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Hironobu SanetoGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Hirofumi IzumotoGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Hidetaro UekiGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Takeaki YoshinoGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Shogo KitahataGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Tomoe KawamuraGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Taira KurodaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Yoshifumi SugaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Hideki MiyataGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Jun HanaokaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Jota WatanabeGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Hiromi OhtaniGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Masashi HirookaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon 791-0295, Japan.
Masanori AbeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon 791-0295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4489-9102
Bunzo MatsuuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon 791-0295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7815-2512
Tomoyuki NinomiyaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Yoichi HiasaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon 791-0295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4117-339X
Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital · JPEhime University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aim: For intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC]-B) cases, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recognized as the standard treatment, while systemic therapy is recommended for TACE-unsuitable HCC. However, because the curative potential is not high, this study was conducted to elucidate the potential outcomes of surgical resection (SR) for BCLC-B HCC cases. Materials/Methods: From January 2000 to July 2022, 70 patients with BCLC-B HCC treated with surgery as the initial treatment were enrolled (median age 67.5 years, beyond up-to-7 criteria 44). Forty-five were treated with SR only (SR group), while twenty-five underwent that with complemental radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (Comb group). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated in both groups. Results: The median albumin−bilirubin (ALBI) score was better in the SR as compared with the Comb group (−2.74 vs. −2.52, p = 0.02), while there were no significant differences between them for median RFS (17.7 vs. 13.1 months; p = 0.70) or median OS (66.6 vs. 72.0 months p = 0.54). As for those beyond up-to-7 criteria, there were no significant differences for median RFS (18.2 vs. 13.0 months; p = 0.36) or median OS (66.5 vs. 72.0 months; p = 0.57). An acceptable five-year cumulative survival rate (>50%) was obtained in both groups (54% vs. 64%). Conclusion: This retrospective study found no significant differences for RFS or OS between the present SR and Comb groups with BCLC-B HCC. When possible to perform, the outcome of SR for BCLC-B is favorable, with a five-year survival rate greater than 50%.

Indexed as

BCLC-Bcollaborationhepatocellular carcinomaradiofrequency ablationsurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID36612233
PMCPMC9818400
OpenAlexW4313389117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.