Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612184›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients: Results from a Large Contemporary Cohort.

Giancarlo Marra, Francesco Soria, Federica Peretti, Marco Oderda, Charles Dariane, Marc-Olivier Timsit, Julien Branchereau, Oussama Hedli, Benoit Mesnard, Derya Tilki and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Giancarlo MarraDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Francesco SoriaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Federica PerettiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Marco OderdaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4681-888X
Charles DarianeDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France.
Marc-Olivier TimsitDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France.
Julien BranchereauInstitut de Transplantation Urologie Nèphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France.
Oussama HedliInstitut de Transplantation Urologie Nèphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France.
Benoit MesnardInstitut de Transplantation Urologie Nèphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France.
Derya TilkiMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Jonathon OlsburghDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Meghana KulkarniDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Veeru KasivisvanathanUniversity College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Cedric LebacleDepartment of Urology, Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Oscar Rodriguez-FabaDepartment of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
Timo SoeterikDepartment of Urology, Saint Antonius Hospital, 3543 AZ Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Giorgio GandagliaDepartment of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Paola TodeschiniDepartment of Nephrology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Luigi BianconeDepartment of Nephrology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Paolo GonteroDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
On Behalf Of The Collaborators
University of Turin · ITGuy's Hospital · GBHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRInstitut de Transplantation Urologie en Nephrologie · FRPuigvert Foundation · ESAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITBicêtre Hospital · FRIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the natural history of prostate cancer (PCa) in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and to clarify the controversy over whether RTRs have a higher risk of PCa and poorer outcomes than non-RTRs, due to factors such as immunosuppression. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of RTRs diagnosed with cM0 PCa between 2001 and 2019. Primary outcomes were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical recurrence and/or progression after active surveillance (AS) and evaluation of variables possibly influencing PCa aggressiveness and outcomes. Management modalities included surgery, radiation, cryotherapy, HIFU, AS, and watchful waiting. Results: We included 166 men from nine institutions. Median age and eGFR at diagnosis were 67 (IQR 60−73) and 45.9 mL/min (IQR 31.5−63.4). ASA score was >2 in 58.4% of cases. Median time from transplant to PCa diagnosis was 117 months (IQR 48−191.5), and median PSA at diagnosis was 6.5 ng/mL (IQR 5.02−10). The biopsy Gleason score was ≥8 in 12.8%; 11.6% and 6.1% patients had suspicion of ≥cT3 > cT2 and cN+ disease. The most frequent management method was radical prostatectomy (65.6%), followed by radiation therapy (16.9%) and AS (10.2%). At a median follow-up of 60.5 months (IQR 31−106) 22.9% of men (n = 38) died, with only n = 4 (2.4%) deaths due to PCa. Local and systemic progression rates were 4.2% and 3.0%. On univariable analysis, no major influence of immunosuppression type was noted, with the exception of a protective effect of antiproliferative agents (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16−0.97, p = 0.04) associated with a decreased risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) or progression after AS. Conclusion: PCa diagnosed in RTRs is mainly of low to intermediate risk and organ-confined at diagnosis, with good cancer control and low PCa death at intermediate follow-up. RTRs have a non-negligible risk of death from causes other than PCa. Aggressive upfront management of the majority of RTRs with PCa may, therefore, be avoided.

Indexed as

immunosuppressionprostate cancerrenal transplantrobotic radical prostatectomytreatment

Identifiers

PMID36612184
PMCPMC9818510
OpenAlexW4313327709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.