Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612170›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

The SAFFO Study: Sex-Related Prognostic Role and Cut-Off Definition of Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Camilla Lisanti, Debora Basile, Silvio Ken Garattini, Annamaria Parnofiello, Carla Corvaja, Francesco Cortiula, Elisa Bertoli, Elena Ongaro, Luisa Foltran, Mariaelena Casagrande and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Camilla LisantiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2536-6765
Debora BasileDepartment of Medical Oncology, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, 88900 Crotone, Italy.
Silvio Ken GarattiniDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Annamaria ParnofielloSandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, 59100 Prato, Italy.
Carla CorvajaDepartment of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Francesco CortiulaDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Elisa BertoliDepartment of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Elena OngaroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0548-7092
Luisa FoltranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
Mariaelena CasagrandeDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Paola Di NardoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8918-1201
Giovanni Gerardo CardellinoDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Gianpiero FasolaDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1254-4705
Angela BuonadonnaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1930-0308
Nicoletta PellaDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Giuseppe AprileDepartment of Medical Oncology, San Bortolo Hospital, Azienda ULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.
Fabio PuglisiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0573-4938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emerging data suggest that gender-related immune system composition affects both immune response and efficacy of immunotherapy in cancer patients (pts). This study aimed to investigate the sex-related prognostic role of MLR in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) pts. Methods: We analyzed a retrospective consecutive cohort of 490 mCRC patients treated from 2009 to 2018 at the Oncology Departments of Aviano and Pordenone (training set) and Udine (validation set), Italy. The prognostic impact of MLR on overall survival (OS) was evaluated with uni- and multivariable Cox regression models. The best cut-off value to predict survival was defined through ROC analyses. Results: Overall, we identified 288 males (59%) and 202 females (41%); 161 patients (33%) had a right-sided, 202 (42%) a left-sided primary, and 122 (25%) a rectal tumor. Interestingly, gender was associated with MLR (p = 0.004) and sidedness (p = 0.006). The obtained cut-off value for MLR in females and males was 0.27 and 0.49, respectively. According to univariate analysis of the training set, MLR (HR 9.07, p ≤ 0.001), MLR > 0.27 in females (HR 1.95, p = 0.003), and MLR > 0.49 in males (HR 2.65, p = 0.010) were associated with poorer OS, which was also confirmed in the validation set. In multivariate analysis, MLR > 0.27 in females (HR 2.77, p = 0.002), MLR > 0.49 in males (HR 5.39, p ≤ 0.001), BRAF mutation (HR 3.38, p ≤ 0.001), and peritoneal metastases (HR 2.50, p = 0.003) were still independently associated with worse OS. Conclusions: Males and females have a different immune response. Our study showed that high MLR, both in males and females, is an unfavorable Independent prognostic factor. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these data.

Indexed as

circulating biomarkerscolorectal cancergenderMLRsex

Identifiers

PMID36612170
PMCPMC9818397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.