Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612144›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Controversies and Opportunities in the Clinical Daily Use of the 21-Gene Assay for Prognostication and Prediction of Chemotherapy Benefit in HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer.

Flavia Jacobs, Mariangela Gaudio, Chiara Benvenuti, Rita De Sanctis, Armando Santoro, Alberto Zambelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Ovarian Suppression: Early Menopause and Late Effects.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Flavia JacobsIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9126-8325
Mariangela GaudioIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Chiara BenvenutiIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Rita De SanctisIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3202-1933
Armando SantoroIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Alberto ZambelliIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1374-1831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several multigene assays have been developed to help clinicians in defining adjuvant treatment for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer. Despite the 21-gene assay having been available for decades, it has only recently been included in the healthcare systems of several countries. Clinical optimisation of the test remains of critical interest to achieve a greater impact of genomic information in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer. Although current guidelines recommend the use of the 21-gene assay in early breast cancer at intermediate risk of relapse, the implication of the Recurrence Score (RS) in some grey areas still remains uncertain. Our aim is to critically discuss the role of RS in peculiar circumstances. In particular, we focus on the complex integration of genomic data with clinicopathological factors; the potential clinical impact of RS in node-positive premenopausal women and in the neoadjuvant setting; the significance of RS in special histologies and in male patients; and the management and time-optimisation of test ordering. In the absence of robust evidence in these areas, we provide perspectives for improving the use of the 21-gene assay in the decision-making process and guide adjuvant treatment decisions even in challenging cases.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapyclinicopathological factorsgenomic signatureHR-positive early breast cancermale breast cancernode-positiveOncotypeDXprecision medicinepremenopausalspecial histologies

Identifiers

PMID36612144
PMCPMC9817989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.