Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612076›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Updated Mortality Analysis of SELTINE, the French Cohort of Nuclear Workers, 1968-2014.

Olivier Laurent, Eric Samson, Sylvaine Caër-Lorho, Lucie Fournier, Dominique Laurier, Klervi Leuraud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Worker studies and their interpretation.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivier LaurentIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Eric SamsonIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Sylvaine Caër-LorhoIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Lucie FournierIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Dominique LaurierIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Klervi LeuraudIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory (LEPID), Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5492-168X
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire · FR

Funding

Electricité de France noneInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire noneOrano none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cohorts of nuclear workers are particularly relevant to study the health effects of protracted exposures to low doses at low dose-rates of ionizing radiation (IR). In France, a cohort of nuclear workers badge-monitored for external IR exposure has been followed-up for several decades. Its size and follow-up period have recently been extended. The present paper focuses on mortality from both cancer and non-cancer diseases in this cohort. The SELTINE cohort of nuclear workers employed by CEA, Orano, and EDF companies was followed-up for mortality from 1968 to 2014. Mortality in the cohort was compared to that in the French general population. Poisson regression methods were used to estimate excess relative rates of mortality per unit of cumulative dose of IR, adjusted for calendar year, age, company, duration of employment, and socioeconomic status. The cohort included 80,348 workers. At the end of the follow-up, the mean attained age was 63 years, and 15,695 deaths were observed. A strong healthy worker effect was observed overall. A significant excess of pleural cancer mortality was observed but not associated with IR dose. Death from solid cancers was positively but non-significantly associated with radiation. Death from leukaemia (excluding chronic lymphocytic leukaemia), dementia, and Alzheimer's disease were positively and significantly associated with IR dose. Estimated dose-risk relationships were consistent with those from other nuclear worker studies for all solid cancers and leukaemia but remained associated with large uncertainty. The association between IR dose and dementia mortality risk should be interpreted with caution and requires further investigation by other studies.

Indexed as

epidemiologyionizing radiationlow dosenuclear workers

Identifiers

PMID36612076
PMCPMC9817793
OpenAlexW4312117036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.