Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612040›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Clinical Practice Evolvement for Post-Operative Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy-Part 2: Feasibility of Margin Reduction for Fractionated Radiation Treatment with Advanced Image Guidance.

Brady S Laughlin, Nathan Y Yu, Stephanie Lo, Jingwei Duan, Zachary Welchel, Katie Tinnon, Mason Beckett, Steven E Schild, William W Wong, Sameer R Keole and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brady S LaughlinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5384-1637
Nathan Y YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Stephanie LoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Jingwei DuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Zachary WelchelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Katie TinnonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Mason BeckettDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Steven E SchildDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
William W WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Sameer R KeoleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Jean-Claude M RwigemaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Carlos E VargasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Yi RongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Planning target volume (PTV) expansion for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy is typically ≥5 mm. Recent clinical trials have proved the feasibility of a reduced margin of 2−3 mm for treatments on MRI-linac. We aim to study the minimum PTV margin needed using iterative cone-beam CT (iCBCT) as image guidance on conventional linacs. Materials/Methods: Fourteen patients who received post-prostatectomy irradiation (8 with an endorectal balloon and 6 without a balloon) were included in this study. Treatment was delivered with volumetric modulated radiation therapy (VMAT). Fractional dose delivery was evaluated in 165 treatment fractions. The bladder, rectal wall, femoral heads, and prostate bed clinical tumor volume (CTV) were contoured and verified on daily iCBCT. PTV margins (0 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm) were evaluated on daily iCBCT. CTV coverage and OAR dose parameters were assessed with each PTV margin. Results: CTV D100% was underdosed with a 0 mm margin in 32% of fractions in comparison with 2 mm (6%) and 4 mm (6%) PTV margin (p ≤ 0.001). CTV D95% > 95% was met in 93−94% fractions for all PTV expansions. CTV D95% > 95% was achieved in more patients with an endorectal balloon than those without: 0 mm—90/91 (99%) vs. 63/74 (85%); 2 mm—90/91 (99%) vs. 65/75 (87%); 4 mm—90/90 (100%) vs. 63/73 (86%). There was no difference in absolute median change in CTV D95% (0.32%) for 0-, 2-, and 4 mm margins. The maximum dose remained under 108% for 100% (0 mm), 97% (2 mm), and 98% (4 mm) of images. Rectal wall maximum dose remained under 108% for 100% (0 mm), 100% (2 mm), and 98% (4 mm) of images. Conclusions: With high-quality iCBCT image guidance, PTV margin accounting for inter-fractional uncertainties can be safely reduced for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. For fractionated radiotherapy, an isotropic expansion of 2 mm and 4 mm may be considered for margin expansion with and without the endorectal balloon. Future application for margin reduction needs to be further evaluated and considered with the advent of shorter post-prostatectomy radiation courses.

Indexed as

advanced image guidanceiCBCTpost prostatectomy radiotherapyPTV margins

Identifiers

PMID36612040
PMCPMC9817842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.