Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36612010›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Squeeze-MNet: Precise Skin Cancer Detection Model for Low Computing IoT Devices Using Transfer Learning.

Rupali Kiran Shinde, Md Shahinur Alam, Md Biddut Hossain, Shariar Md Imtiaz, JoonHyun Kim, Anuja Anil Padwal, Nam Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Skin Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning-A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rupali Kiran ShindeDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4631-5353
Md Shahinur AlamVL2 Center, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC 20002, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8413-5428
Md Biddut HossainDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-9128
Shariar Md ImtiazDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7001-1667
JoonHyun KimDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.
Anuja Anil PadwalAshwini Rural Collage, Solapur 413006, India.
Nam KimDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8109-2055

Funding

Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion 2020-0-01846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains a deadly disease. We developed a lightweight, accurate, general-purpose deep learning algorithm for skin cancer classification. Squeeze-MNet combines a Squeeze algorithm for digital hair removal during preprocessing and a MobileNet deep learning model with predefined weights. The Squeeze algorithm extracts important image features from the image, and the black-hat filter operation removes noise. The MobileNet model (with a dense neural network) was developed using the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) dataset to fine-tune the model. The proposed model is lightweight; the prototype was tested on a Raspberry Pi 4 Internet of Things device with a Neo pixel 8-bit LED ring; a medical doctor validated the device. The average precision (AP) for benign and malignant diagnoses was 99.76% and 98.02%, respectively. Using our approach, the required dataset size decreased by 66%. The hair removal algorithm increased the accuracy of skin cancer detection to 99.36% with the ISIC dataset. The area under the receiver operating curve was 98.9%.

Indexed as

AUC-ROCdeep learningIoTmalignantMobileNetskin cancer detectionsqueezed datasettransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36612010
PMCPMC9817940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.