Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611926›Full record

ReviewCells2022

Cellular Senescence in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Passenger or the Driver?

Xiurong Cai, Adrien Guillot, Hanyang Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiurong CaiDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology (CVK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6937-3708
Adrien GuillotDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology (CVK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6002-9986
Hanyang LiuDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology (CVK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1035-4895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the high morbidity and mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a major yet growing burden for our global community. The relapse-prone nature and drug resistance of HCC are regarded as the consequence of varying intracellular processes and extracellular interplay, which actively participate in tumor microenvironment remodeling. Amongst them, cellular senescence is regarded as a fail-safe program, leading to double-sword effects of both cell growth inhibition and tissue repair promotion. Particularly, cellular senescence serves a pivotal role in the progression of chronic inflammatory liver diseases, ultimately leading to carcinogenesis. Given the current challenges in improving the clinical management and outcome of HCC, senescence may exert striking potential in affecting anti-cancer strategies. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have emerged to investigate senescence-associated hepatocarcinogenesis and its derived therapies. In this review, we intend to provide an up-to-date understanding of liver cell senescence and its impacts on treatment modalities of HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisCellular SenescenceHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTumor Microenvironmentcell-cycle arrestliver cancersenescence-associated secretory phenotypesenescence-targeting therapy

Identifiers

PMID36611926
PMCPMC9818733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.