Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611752›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Alterations in Healthy Adult Canine Faecal Microbiome and Selected Metabolites as a Result of Feeding a Commercial Complete Synbiotic Diet with

Stinna Nybroe, Pernille B Horsman, Kamilla Krag, Therese G Hosbjerg, Kathrine Stenberg, Bekzod Khakimov, Jørgen Baymler, Charlotte R Bjørnvad, Ida N Kieler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of the ProbioticVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stinna NybroeDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1165 København, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8467-1906
Pernille B HorsmanOdder Dyreklinik, Banegårdsgade 24, 8300 Odder, Denmark.
Kamilla KragØstfyns Dyrehospital, Skovgyden 15, 5800 Nyborg, Denmark.
Therese G HosbjergBacterfield GmbH, 20354 Hamburg, Germany.
Kathrine StenbergDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1165 København, Denmark.
Bekzod KhakimovDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1165 København, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6580-2034
Jørgen BaymlerBacterfield GmbH, 20354 Hamburg, Germany.
Charlotte R BjørnvadDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1165 København, Denmark.
Ida N KielerDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1165 København, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKHou Maritime Idrætsefterskole · DK

Funding

Bacterfield GmbH, Hamburg, Germany No grant number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In dogs, the use of probiotics for preventive or therapeutic purposes has become increasingly common, however the evidence for beneficial effects are often limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of feeding a diet containing

Indexed as

cholesterolcobalamindogE. faeciumfaecal qualitymicrobial relative abundancemicrobial richnessprobioticsshort chain fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID36611752
PMCPMC9817848
OpenAlexW4313361397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.