ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022
The Benefits and Challenges of Conducting Primate Research in Different Settings.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Touchscreen and Translational Cognition: A Systematic Review of Trials in Humans and Rodents.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025Pooled it
- CapuchinAI 1.0: Development of a Machine Learning-Based Touchscreen Paradigm to Test Cognition in Wild Capuchins.American journal of primatology · 2026Article
- Sources of Variation in Fecal Haptoglobin in a Population of Wild Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus imitator).American journal of primatology · 2026Article
- Bimanual Coordination and Right-Hand Bias in Extractive Foraging by Wild Sapajus libidinosus.American journal of primatology · 2026Article
- CapuchinAI 1.0: Development of a machine learning-based touchscreen paradigm to test cognition in wild capuchins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Reintroduction training is instrumental in restoring the oral microbiota of giant pandas from "captivity" to "wildness".BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Effects of psychedelics on opioid use disorder: a scoping review of preclinical studies.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Digitalising behavioural data collection through cloud-based technology in veterinary science and beyond.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Behavioral Welfare Research for the Management of Sanctuary Chimpanzees (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internationally, primate research takes place in laboratories, zoos, sanctuaries, and the wild. All of these settings present unique advantages and challenges in terms of methodology, translatability, animal welfare, and ethics. In this novel commentary, we explore the scientific and ethical benefits and drawbacks of conducting non-invasive psychological research with primates in each setting. We also suggest ways to overcome some of the barriers. We argue that while there may be greater experimental control in laboratory-based research, settings that more closely mirror primates' natural habitats are generally better suited to meet their specialized needs. More naturalistic research settings, including field studies, may also circumvent some ethical concerns associated with research in captivity, and yield more ecologically valid data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.