Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611728›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Dietary Inclusion of Defatted Silkworm (

Eszter Zsedely, Marco Cullere, Georgina Takacs, Zsolt Herman, Klaudia Szalai, Yazavinder Singh, Antonella Dalle Zotte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eszter ZsedelyDepartment of Animal Science, Szechenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, H-9026 Győr, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2356-5648
Marco CullereDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Agripolis, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9409-8202
Georgina TakacsDepartment of Animal Science, Szechenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, H-9026 Győr, Hungary.
Zsolt HermanDepartment of Animal Science, Szechenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, H-9026 Győr, Hungary.
Klaudia SzalaiDepartment of Animal Science, Szechenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, H-9026 Győr, Hungary.
Yazavinder SinghDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Agripolis, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3811-4372
Antonella Dalle ZotteDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Agripolis, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9214-9504
Széchenyi István University · HUUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

University of Padua 2020-DOR2082232/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was conducted to assess the effects of a 4% defatted silkworm (SWM-DEF) meal dietary incorporation into chickens’ diet at different growth stages on growth performances, carcass, and meat quality traits. A total of 90 Ross 308 one-day-old male broiler chickens were randomly allocated into 3 dietary groups of 5 replicated pens/diet (6 chickens/pen). One group was fed a standard soybean-based diet (C); group SWM1 consumed a starter diet (1−10 days of age) including 4% SWM-DEF and then the C diet up to slaughter (11−42 days of age); group SWM2 was fed with the C diet in the starter phase and the 4% SWM-DEF diet up to slaughter. Individual live weight and pen feed intake were determined at the end of each feeding phase: starter, grower, and finisher. Weight gain and FCR were then calculated. At 42 days of age, chickens were slaughtered and carcass traits determined. Leg and breast physico-chemical meat quality was also evaluated. Results confirmed that SWM-DEF could be a possible alternative feed source for chickens since growth performance, carcass, and meat physical traits were overall comparable in the three treatment groups. The feeding stage seemed to play a relevant impact on the sole meat protein content (SWM1 < SMW2 and C; p < 0.001). Concluding, the results available to date indicate that 4% SWM-DEF can be provided to chickens in different growth phases, and the choice of the inclusion period is more an industrial cost-benefit evaluation. From the scientific point of view, however, an administration in the grower-finisher phase rather than in the starter one provided the best meat nutritional quality. Further investigations should focus on the impact on meat fatty acids profile and sensory traits, which are of utmost importance for consumers.

Indexed as

feedinghybrid chickeninsectmeat physical traitsmeat proximate composition

Identifiers

PMID36611728
PMCPMC9817789
OpenAlexW4313327445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.