ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Holistic Approach to Identify and Classify COVID-19 from Chest Radiographs, ECG, and CT-Scan Images Using ShuffleNet Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- A hybrid model for early diagnosis of ophthalmology diseases leveraging CNNs, SBOA optimization, and XAI for visualization.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Fuzzy based residual shufflenet based breast cancer detection using mammogram images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based differentiation of non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease and pulmonary tuberculosis using chest CT.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning and Explainable AI-Based Approach for the Classification of Discomycetes Species.Biology · 2025Article
- Deep learning models for CT image classification: a comprehensive literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- SVNC-Net: An optimized U-Net variant with 2D convolutions for lightweight 3D spleen segmentation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Spontaneous Abortion: A Histopathology Dataset and Benchmark for Products of Conception.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Short- and Long-Term Chest-CT Findings after Recovery from COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Enhanced Pelican Optimization Algorithm with Deep Learning-Driven Mitotic Nuclei Classification on Breast Histopathology Images.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automated Uterine Fibroids Detection in Ultrasound Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multimodality Imaging of COVID-19 Using Fine-Tuned Deep Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Longitudinal Chest X-ray Scores and their Relations with Clinical Variables and Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Predicting CTS Diagnosis and Prognosis Based on Machine Learning Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An effective approach for plant leaf diseases classification based on a novel DeepPlantNet deep learning model.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- TumorDetNet: A unified deep learning model for brain tumor detection and classification.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and precise COVID-19 identification and analysis are pivotal in reducing the spread of COVID-19. Medical imaging techniques, such as chest X-ray or chest radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scan, and electrocardiogram (ECG) trace images are the most widely known for early discovery and analysis of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Deep learning (DL) frameworks for identifying COVID-19 positive patients in the literature are limited to one data format, either ECG or chest radiograph images. Moreover, using several data types to recover abnormal patterns caused by COVID-19 could potentially provide more information and restrict the spread of the virus. This study presents an effective COVID-19 detection and classification approach using the Shufflenet CNN by employing three types of images, i.e., chest radiograph, CT-scan, and ECG-trace images. For this purpose, we performed extensive classification experiments with the proposed approach using each type of image. With the chest radiograph dataset, we performed three classification experiments at different levels of granularity, i.e., binary, three-class, and four-class classifications. In addition, we performed a binary classification experiment with the proposed approach by classifying CT-scan images into COVID-positive and normal. Finally, utilizing the ECG-trace images, we conducted three experiments at different levels of granularity, i.e., binary, three-class, and five-class classifications. We evaluated the proposed approach with the baseline COVID-19 Radiography Database, SARS-CoV-2 CT-scan, and ECG images dataset of cardiac and COVID-19 patients. The average accuracy of 99.98% for COVID-19 detection in the three-class classification scheme using chest radiographs, optimal accuracy of 100% for COVID-19 detection using CT scans, and average accuracy of 99.37% for five-class classification scheme using ECG trace images have proved the efficacy of our proposed method over the contemporary methods. The optimal accuracy of 100% for COVID-19 detection using CT scans and the accuracy gain of 1.54% (in the case of five-class classification using ECG trace images) from the previous approach, which utilized ECG images for the first time, has a major contribution to improving the COVID-19 prediction rate in early stages. Experimental findings demonstrate that the proposed framework outperforms contemporary models. For example, the proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art DL approaches, such as Squeezenet, Alexnet, and Darknet19, by achieving the accuracy of 99.98 (proposed method), 98.29, 98.50, and 99.67, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.