Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611452›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Deep Learning System for Automated Quality Evaluation of Optic Disc Photographs in Neuro-Ophthalmic Disorders.

Ebenezer Chan, Zhiqun Tang, Raymond P Najjar, Arun Narayanaswamy, Kanchalika Sathianvichitr, Nancy J Newman, Valérie Biousse, Dan Milea, Bonsai Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ebenezer ChanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Zhiqun TangSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Raymond P NajjarSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3770-2300
Arun NarayanaswamySingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Kanchalika SathianvichitrSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Nancy J NewmanDepartments of Ophthalmology and Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Valérie BiousseDepartments of Ophthalmology and Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Dan MileaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6388-8639
Bonsai GroupSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Singapore National Eye Center · SGEmory University · USNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Singapore National Medical Research Council CIRG18Nov-0013SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre 05/FYP2019/P2/06-A60
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of ocular fundus photographs can affect the accuracy of the morphologic assessment of the optic nerve head (ONH), either by humans or by deep learning systems (DLS). In order to automatically identify ONH photographs of optimal quality, we have developed, trained, and tested a DLS, using an international, multicentre, multi-ethnic dataset of 5015 ocular fundus photographs from 31 centres in 20 countries participating to the Brain and Optic Nerve Study with Artificial Intelligence (BONSAI). The reference standard in image quality was established by three experts who independently classified photographs as of "good", "borderline", or "poor" quality. The DLS was trained on 4208 fundus photographs and tested on an independent external dataset of 807 photographs, using a multi-class model, evaluated with a one-vs-rest classification strategy. In the external-testing dataset, the DLS could identify with excellent performance "good" quality photographs (AUC = 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95), accuracy = 91.4% (95% CI, 90.0-92.9%), sensitivity = 93.8% (95% CI, 92.5-95.2%), specificity = 75.9% (95% CI, 69.7-82.1%) and "poor" quality photographs (AUC = 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00), accuracy = 99.1% (95% CI, 98.6-99.6%), sensitivity = 81.5% (95% CI, 70.6-93.8%), specificity = 99.7% (95% CI, 99.6-100.0%). "Borderline" quality images were also accurately classified (AUC = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), accuracy = 90.6% (95% CI, 89.1-92.2%), sensitivity = 65.4% (95% CI, 56.6-72.9%), specificity = 93.4% (95% CI, 92.1-94.8%). The overall accuracy to distinguish among the three classes was 90.6% (95% CI, 89.1-92.1%), suggesting that this DLS could select optimal quality fundus photographs in patients with neuro-ophthalmic and neurological disorders affecting the ONH.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningoptic nerve headpapilledemaretinal image quality assessment

Identifiers

PMID36611452
PMCPMC9818957
OpenAlexW4313583854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.