Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611430›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Comparative Study of Choroidal Vascular and Structural Characteristics of Typical Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy and Polypoidal Choroidal Neovascularization: OCTA-Based Evaluation of Intervortex Venous Anastomosis.

Figen Batıoğlu, Özge Yanık, Ferhad Özer, Sibel Demirel, Emin Özmert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Figen BatıoğluDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, 06620 Ankara, Turkey.
Özge YanıkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, 06620 Ankara, Turkey.
Ferhad ÖzerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, 06620 Ankara, Turkey.
Sibel DemirelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, 06620 Ankara, Turkey.
Emin ÖzmertDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, 06620 Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the choroidal characteristics of typical polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (T-PCV) and polypoidal choroidal neovascularization (P-CNV) cases, and to investigate the presence of intervortex venous anastomoses in these PCV subtypes by using en face optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

methodsA total of 35 eyes of 33 PCV cases were included. The PCV cases were divided into T-PCV and P-CNV groups. The choroidal vascularity index (CVI) was calculated. En face OCTA images were evaluated for the presence of intervortex venous anastomoses. The diameter of the largest anastomotic Haller vessel was measured.

resultsT-PCV cases had significantly higher mean CVI values (73.9 ± 3.7 vs. 70.8 ± 4.5%) than P-CNV cases (

conclusionsThe higher CVI value in T-PCV may be an important feature concerning the pathogenesis and classification of PCV. Although there was no difference between the two subtypes in terms of intervortex anastomosis, more dilated anastomotic vessels were observed in the T-PCV.

Indexed as

choroidal vascularity indexindocyanine green angiographyoptical coherence tomography angiographypolypoidal choroidal neovascularizationtypical polypoidal choroidal vasculopathyvortex vein anastomoses

Identifiers

PMID36611430
PMCPMC9818584
OpenAlexW4313471965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.