Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611421›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Clinical Applications of Quantitative Perfusion Imaging with a C-Arm Flat-Panel Detector-A Systematic Review.

Abdallah H A Zaid Al-Kaylani, Richte C L Schuurmann, Wouter D Maathuis, Riemer H J A Slart, Jean-Paul P M De Vries, Reinoud P H Bokkers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Clinical applications of portable CT scanners.The British journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Improved Precision and Safety of Supra-Tentorial Intracranial Hematoma Puncture Using C-Arm CT Four-Dimensional Navigation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdallah H A Zaid Al-KaylaniDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1332-3346
Richte C L SchuurmannDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-3939
Wouter D MaathuisDepartment of Biomedical Photonic Imaging, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Riemer H J A SlartDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5565-1164
Jean-Paul P M De VriesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2669-320X
Reinoud P H BokkersDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6130-7311
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C-arm systems with digital flat-panel detectors are used in interventional radiology and hybrid operating rooms for visualizing and performing interventions on three-dimensional structures. Advances in C-arm technology have enabled intraoperative quantitative perfusion imaging with these scanners. This systematic review provides an overview of flat-panel detector C-arm techniques for quantifying perfusion, their clinical applications, and their validation. A systematic search was performed for articles published between January 2000 and October 2022 in which a flat-panel detector C-arm technique for quantifying perfusion was compared with a reference technique. Nine articles were retrieved describing two techniques: two-dimensional perfusion angiography (n = 5) and dual-phase cone beam computed tomography perfusion (n = 4). A quality assessment revealed no concerns about the applicability of the studies. The risk of bias was relatively high for the index and reference tests. Both techniques demonstrated potential for clinical application; however, weak-to-moderate correlations were reported between them and the reference techniques. In conclusion, both techniques could add new possibilities to treatment planning and follow-up; however, the available literature is relatively scarce and heterogeneous. Larger-scale randomized prospective studies focusing on clinical outcomes and standardization are required for the full understanding and clinical implementation of these techniques.

Indexed as

C-armcone-beam computed tomographydual-phase perfusionflat-panel detectorperfusion angiographyperfusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID36611421
PMCPMC9818280
OpenAlexW4313472038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.